Mars atmosphere was once rich with oxygen, say scientists. Where did it go?

The discovery of manganese oxide on the Red Planet has raised questions about Mars's evolution.

|
NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/Reuters/File
An evenly-layered rock on the planet Mars, photographed by the Mast Camera (Mastcam) on NASA's Curiosity Mars Rover is shown in a NASA handout provided Dec. 9, 2014. It shows a pattern typical of a lake-floor sedimentary deposit. Billions of years ago, say scientists, a lake once filled the crater being explored by Curiosity, bolstering evidence that the planet most like Earth in the solar system may have been suitable for microbial life.

Early Mars might have had both liquid water on its surface and oxygen in its atmosphere, according to a new study published in Geophysical Research Letters.

Findings by NASA’s Curiosity and Opportunity rovers reveal that, beneath the Red Planet’s dusty surface lurk substantial deposits of manganese oxide, a compound likely created by a marriage of liquid water and atmospheric oxygen.

“This is a piece of the puzzle in our understanding of early Mars,” study co-author Raymond Arvidson tells The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview, “and the potential for habitation on a planet like Mars.”

Manganese is very difficult to oxidize, according to the study’s lead author Nina Lanza, requiring large quantities of liquid water and a lot of oxygen.

Although other chemical reactions can oxidize manganese, Dr. Lanza tells the Monitor, oxygen is the most likely culprit.

When Curiosity found high concentrations of manganese oxide in a crater on Mars, Lanza says, scientists using the ChemCham (a rover tool that analyzes the chemistry rock and mineral samples) were surprised.

On Earth, manganese oxides are created by either the presence of oxygen, or tiny creatures called microbes. Researchers say that the former is far more likely on Mars than the latter.

Free oxygen on Earth was rare before life evolved and began the process of photosynthesis, explains Lanza, so oxygen can serve as a biosignature, or a sign that a planet has life.

But if Mars had enough oxygen to oxidize manganese, scientists may have to reevaluate the idea of oxygen as a biosignature, she says, as this provides evidence for a highly oxygen-rich atmosphere at one point in Mars’s history, but there is still no proof of life.

So where, then, did all of Mars’s oxygen go?

Into the rocks. “Oxygen is very reactive,” says Dr. Arvidson, “and unless you replenish it, it would be consumed very quickly.”

As Mars’s liquid core cooled, probably about 4.2 billion years ago, its magnetic field grew weaker and weaker, leaving its atmosphere susceptible to solar winds. At that time, Mars likely had a lot more water than today. Without a magnetic field to protect it, radiation could have split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. Solar winds would have stripped away the lighter hydrogen atoms, leaving behind oxygen atoms to rust (oxidize) surface minerals and turn the planet red.

“This tells us that Mars has evolved very differently than we thought it did,” Lanza told the Monitor. “We need to start looking for different types of minerals and other evidence about Mars’s past.”  

Researchers are quick to caution that the presence of a more oxygen-rich atmosphere does not mean that Mars ever played host to life, or that it was even truly Earth-like. But it is a clue.

“It is another piece of the puzzle,” reiterates Arvidson.

“This is the first step towards understanding planets like Mars,” says Lanza, “but it is not the last step.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Mars atmosphere was once rich with oxygen, say scientists. Where did it go?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0630/Mars-atmosphere-was-once-rich-with-oxygen-say-scientists.-Where-did-it-go
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe