Why beloved polar bear may face bigger risk than previously thought

A new study rejects the long-held belief that the state of 'walking hibernation' would help polar bears weather climate change.

|
Susanne Miller/Reuters/File
A polar bear keeps close to her cubs along the Beaufort Sea coast in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska on March 6, 2007.

The embattled polar bear may be at greater risk from climate change than previously thought, according to a three-year study conducted in the southern Beaufort Sea.

The new study refutes the long-held belief that polar bears can resort to a status of "walking hibernation" to managed energy loss during periods of increased fasting as a result of diminished food stores.

While warmer months bring bountiful harvests to more southern climes, polar bears' access to food supplies become more scarce during the summer due to reductions in sea ice. Research from the 1970s suggested that "walking hibernation” helps polar bears weather these periods of limited food, but the study published on Thursday in the journal Science rejects this idea.

“We haven't known until now whether bears really reduce their metabolism in summer, which, if they did, may have offered a limited buffer from some of the negative effects of ice loss," said lead author John Whiteman of the University of Wyoming.

The study found that activity and temperature patterns recorded for polar bears in summer were typical of food-deprived mammals rather than hibernating mammals.

Karyn Rode, U.S. Geological Survey research wildlife biologist in Anchorage who was part of a polar bear fasting study published in 2012, told The Associated Press that the new study confirms that polar bears can't conserve energy when they're fasting.”

That's especially troubling considering the rate at which the Arctic has been warming due to climate change. As The Christian Science Monitor’s Pete Spotts reported in December 2014:

Reductions in summer sea ice between 1987 and 2011 cut the polar bear population in western Hudson's Bay by a third, from 1,200 animals to 800. Along the norther coast of Alaska and east into Canada, the population centered along the southern Beaufort Sea fell by 40 percent between 2001 and 2010 to around 900 bears. Since then the population appears to have stabilized. Several regions in northern Canada have seen populations that have remained stable, while one region hosts an increasing population of polar bears.

The newly published study’s co-author, Steve Amstrup, a retired US Geological Survey polar bear researcher now affiliated with Montana-based Polar Bears International says it is already clear what needs to be done to save polar bears from extinction. “All of the studies in the world won't help us there. If we don't deal with greenhouse gas emissions, those of us who have been studying polar bears for our whole lives will be nothing more than polar bear historians,” AP reported.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why beloved polar bear may face bigger risk than previously thought
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Science-Notebook/2015/0717/Why-beloved-polar-bear-may-face-bigger-risk-than-previously-thought
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe