Electric 'robocabs': Key to curbing vehicle emissions?

Driverless cars are coming, but overhauling a single niche sector like taxi cabs could be cost-effective and good for the environment, according to a new study

|
Eric Risberg/AP/File
California Gov. Jerry Brown, front left, rides in a driverless car to a bill signing at Google headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., Sept. 25, 2012. A new study suggests that the introduction of driverless cabs could lead to a significant reduction in greenhouse gases.

What if, by 2030, every taxi in the US was automated, electric and self-driving? 

The answer, according to a new study in the journal "Nature Climate Change" from researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, is that greenhouse gas emissions could be significantly dented, and they could be significantly dented for cheap.

Not only would this theoretical green fleet of self-driving taxis help the environment – per-mile greenhouse gas emissions from cars could drop by as much as 90 percent by 2030, according to the study – but the service would be cost-effective as well.

“You don’t often find that, where the cheapest is also the greenest,” said Jeff Greenblatt, co-author of the study, in an interview with Popular Science.

Even if an driverless electric car cost $150,000 up front, the researchers say that a car that could drive round the clock, not require a salary, and not use any gasoline would pay for itself within five years.

The paper does make a number of assumptions, including: predicted vehicle efficiencies in 2030, that vehicles would be electric and re-designed to be more compact and efficient, and that every vehicle would be scheduled correctly to minimize emissions. Efficiencies can depend on how many people are in the car, the route taken, and so on.

“By considering what happens when you’re sharing, these vehicles enable much bigger energy savings,” said Dr. Greenblatt in an interview with the MIT Technology Review.

But with driverless cars becoming increasingly popular and inching towards commercialization, researchers believe the taxi industry could be one of the first niche sectors to become fully automated.

Writing for the MIT Technology Review, Will Knight says that there would be advantages for coordinated fleets of vehicles, “especially for often-traveled routes. This could significantly change the transportation industry and potentially upend an entire sector of employment.”

Whether the automated taxi revolution plays out exactly as described in this study remains unclear. Other studies have found that environmental benefits would be marginal at best. A 2014 study from the Intelligent Transportation Society of America found that increased use of automation in vehicles could result in a reduction of 20 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions over a ten-year period, which isn’t much in the context of emissions from the transportation sector – the second largest emissions source in the US at over 1,800 metric tons of CO2 in 2012.

Austin Brown, a scientist at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Washington, D.C., writes in an accompanying article in Nature Climate Change that “there are reasons to be cautious.”

“The future of transportation energy depends on how the system is used by people,” he adds. “Small, efficient vehicles will have to compete for customers with larger, comfort- or productivity-focused vehicles.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Electric 'robocabs': Key to curbing vehicle emissions?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0706/Electric-robocabs-Key-to-curbing-vehicle-emissions
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe