Six mobile payment systems and how they’re working so far

Mobile payments have struggled in the US, even as the technology appears to be flourishing in many other countries across the globe. Here's a look at a few platforms vying to replace consumers' wallets or even their banks.

Eric Risberg/AP/File
Apple Senior Vice President of Internet Software and Services, demonstrates the new Apple Pay mobile payment system at a Whole Foods store in Cupertino, Calif., in October 2014.

1. Apple Pay

Eric Risberg/AP/File
Apple Senior Vice President of Internet Software and Services, demonstrates the new Apple Pay mobile payment system at a Whole Foods store in Cupertino, Calif., in October 2014.

The company’s announcement of its own mobile payment system in September 2014 was by far the splashiest, with Apple head Tim Cook saying the system would be “an entirely new category of service.”

Apple Pay works by allowing customers using an iPhone to add a range of supported credit and debit cards to their digital wallet. Making a purchase involves tapping a phone on a pay terminal at a range of retailers — from grocery stores to restaurants to electronics stores that have installed so-called near-field communication (NFC) terminals.

Apple says the system provides additional layers of security by anonymizing a users’ credit card — a process known as tokenization.
This token, rather than an actual credit card number, is the only information provided to a retailer, along with a unique security code that changes for each purchase. To approve a purchase, users must also scan their fingerprint on the iPhone, providing an additional layer of security over traditional magnetic-strip-based credit cards.

But so far, Apple Pay has faced similar obstacles to other NFC-based mobile payment systems, such as Google Wallet, first introduced in 2011, and Softcard — which was briefly known as Isis, but later changed its name — a mobile payment system backed by T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon. Google acquired Softcard in February 2015.

A key concern is that, while tapping a phone can be more convenient than swiping a card and entering a pin, the products can be cumbersome to set up. There are also compatibility issues — only recent iPhone models include an NFC chip, meaning that users with earlier phones can’t use the service. Apple Pay currently works with Visa, MasterCard, and American Express cards, with the company reportedly making money from the service by charging fees to banks that issue credit cards rather than merchants or users.

When the system launched, there were 200,000 tap-based terminals, now projected to surpass 1.5 million by the end of 2015.
But some observers say the widespread use of credit cards as a payment system is still a significant challenge for mobile payment providers.

“I think the biggest obstacle right how here in the US is that it doesn’t solve an obvious problem,” James Wester, an analyst at the market research firm IDC who focuses on mobile payments, told the Monitor in November. “For those who really back mobile payments, there’s kind of a divide between the banking system and the technology providers, there are a lot companies coming in trying to quote-un-quote ‘disrupt’ payments. The problem is that payments isn’t a very exciting thing to disrupt, because it works very well."

1 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.