New iPhone in March: Why bigger isn't always better

A rumored new iPhone 5se will be smaller, a sign that tinier tech could mark the next wave of digital gadgets.

|
Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters/File
A woman tries Apple's iPhone 6 at an Apple store in Beijing, in this November 2, 2015 file photo. A rumored new iPhone 5se will be smaller, another mark that tinier tech could mark the next wave of digital gadgets.

Bigger is not always better, and rumors suggest Apple's next foray into iPhone design will be smaller.

The next iPhone will likely be four inches long, an "enhanced" special edition called the iPhone 5se with a March release by Apple, Mark Gurman reported Friday for 9to5Mac.

A return to a smaller iPhone suggests Apple isn't simply pushing out larger smartphones (due to bigger screens) that have proven popular with competitors, but sees there remains a niche for smaller devices. 

Apple's decision to scale down its iPhone's size might be seen as a half-step back to an older consumer tech philosophy. For decades, success meant bringing computers from the size of a room, to a desktop, to a person's lap, and finally to a hand-held device. The clock turned back when it reached the tiny iPod Nano, as consumers wanted screens large enough to watch video and manipulate touch-screen devices.

"A four-inch iPhone would probably make some users with small hands and even smaller pockets very happy, but there’s a reason phones keep getting bigger — they just sell better," wrote Ryan Whitwam for Geek. "Most consumers don’t seem to mind using two hands to operate their phone."

Why then is Apple experimenting with smaller gadgets again? It could partly stem from a growing interest in wearable technology, which already promises a new kind of convenience, according to some buyers.

"The big plus is that it’s touching your skin and so I will not miss a notification," says Jake Faulkner, who purchased an Apple Watch after graduating college and starting work in Salt Lake City, Utah. "You can wear it and you don’t necessarily have to touch it . . .It helps you to multitask."

Mr. Faulkner is like many Apple Watch users in that he does not use all the features available, but rather he wears it as a companion to his iPhone. Apple could be trying a smaller model of iPhone as a prequel to further experiments with how users are willing to interact with technology.

"Apple has popularised existing technologies four times: with the Macintosh computer in 1984, the iPod in 2001, the iPhone in 2007 and the iPad in 2010," reported the Economist. "The launch of the Apple Watch points to a broader story: high expectations that wearable technology will soon take off."

Apple is not the only company experimenting with size and function. Microsoft has advertised its 12-inch Surface Pro 3 as "the tablet that can replace your laptop." PC Magazine gave the device top ratings, although Matthew Buzzi wrote that Microsoft's efforts to push the consumer paradigm for how devices should be used – like Apple's – were seeing mixed results.

"The Microsoft Surface line of tablets has been fairly divisive," he wrote. "For every evangelist there are plenty of skeptics who doubt the device can truly replace a laptop."

Faulkner has transitioned fully into Apple but is also skeptical of the trend to boost the iPhone size. He says friends who own the larger iPhone 6 have regretted it, though, suggesting the popularity of skinny jeans as a cause. His enthusiasm lies in wearable technology.

"If they came out with an Apple shirt where you could just change the design, I think that would be pretty cool," Faulkner says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to New iPhone in March: Why bigger isn't always better
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0123/New-iPhone-in-March-Why-bigger-isn-t-always-better
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe