Why did Amazon remove encryption from Fire devices?

The newest update to Amazon’s Fire operating system removes the option for users to encrypt their open files. The decision is one based on customer preference, according to the e-commerce company, but critics fear it will set a bad precedent. 

|
Ted S. Warren/AP
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos walks on stage for the launch of the new Amazon Fire Phone, June 18, 2014. Amazon has recently taken encryption off of their Amazon fire OS.

Device encryption is no longer an option for users who updated to Amazon Fire’s newest operating system.

Fire OS 5 “Bellini,” introduced last fall, has removed the ability to encrypt local files on Amazon devices. The shift means that any future data stored on devices will be more vulnerable to hacking if the devices fall into the wrong hands. The update also affects information that was previously encrypted in older versions of the OS.

News of the change arrived as encryption technology becomes an increasingly contentious topic. A high-profile legal battle between Apple Inc. and federal law enforcement officials over an encrypted device owned by a terrorism suspect is currently underway.

But Amazon’s decision to discontinue encryption features may have had less to do with the company’s feelings toward the process and more to do with how customers were using their product.

“In the fall when we released Fire OS 5, we removed some enterprise features that we found customers weren’t using," an Amazon spokesperson told The Christian Science Monitor. ”All Fire tablets’ communication with Amazon’s cloud meet our high standards for privacy and security including appropriate use of encryption.”

Device encryption, according to Amazon, was one of the features that was not widely used by consumers.

Previously, if a user’s encrypted phone was obtained by someone else, all files stored on the phone would be unreadable – including texts, photos, emails, passwords, and any sensitive information like credit card numbers.

But if no one was using the feature, is there harm in cutting it?

Some critics are against removing security features just because they aren’t popular – using complex passwords and differing passwords for each account add more steps for users, but are still pushed by the technology industry because they are seen as necessary security measures.

It’s possible Amazon made the decision based on performance reviews. Android reported performance problems, especially in cheaper model phones, when its team tried to make encryption default on the Android 5.0 Lollipop OS, which is similar to Fire OS 5, according to The Verge.

Android 5.0 Lollipop was able to offer encryption as an optional feature on its devices. Users could turn it on and decide for themselves if the added security warranted the performance hit. With Fire OS 5 devices, that option is not available.

In general, there seem to be few options for Fire device users who still want encryption.

“They can refuse to update (but that presents its own security patching issues and could later become mandatory); they can upgrade and hope for the best; or they can stop using their Fire devices — none of which seem ideal,” The Verge’s Ashley Carman writes.

Amazon devices that do not use the Fire OS will not be impacted by the recent change to encryption. The company has stated in the past that products like Amazon Echo, which uses microphones to respond to voice commands, are highly encrypted. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why did Amazon remove encryption from Fire devices?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0304/Why-did-Amazon-remove-encryption-from-Fire-devices
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe