Sansa Stark and others deal with crisis in the newest 'Game of Thrones'

Sansa Stark and other characters must make sense of their chaotic world in the newest 'Game of Thrones' episode. Sansa Stark is portrayed by Sophie Turner on the series.

|
Keith Bernstein/HBO/AP
Sansa Stark is portrayed by Sophie Turner on 'Game of Thrones.'

As the world of Game of Thrones becomes a larger and seemingly more diverse place, and as characters spread out, roaming great distances between locations worthy enough of being named and animated in the opening credits, it would seem that the spaces need to be joined by something, just to keep the series from becoming too disjointed. And so, as things progress, it becomes clear no matter how many miles are between this location or that, there is always a single driving notion that manages to unite them. Lately, that notion calls back to last season, when Petyr Baelish first mentioned the idea that Chaos is a ladder,” and then essentially adopted it as his own personal axiom; something to go along with the black mockingbird from which the episode gets its title. 

In that sense, ‘Mockingbird’ is Petyr Baelish’s episode, even though Aidan Gillen only appears in the final moments, to ostensibly prove his maxim by speaking the utter truth one moment – yes, Robin’s mother should have smacked the moon door lust out of him years ago – and then, like flipping a switch, throws whatever good standing his previous sentiment earned him to the wind, by stealing a kiss from young Sansa, seemingly knowing it would provide him with the opportunity to shove his new bride Lysa from the moon door her obnoxious, snow castle-stomping son was so obsessed with.

Now that’s not the move that a Stark would have made in their usually honor-bound way of acting in the world, but, then again, that may be why the Starks are an endangered species in Westeros. If anything, writers D.B. Weiss and David Benioff wisely used this episode to highlight the actions of Petyr Baelish because it was the moment in the season they wanted to illustrate that the world has seemingly been thrown into a state of imbalance, and how those who can manage chaos the way some can wield a sword are the first, and often times, the only ones who will survive, if not thrive.

Sure, the idea that the world is in utter disarray is a common one on the show, but every now and again it’s nice to see the writers demonstrate it, and then underline it as exquisitely as they did during the scene where Arya and the Hound come upon a dying man. The sight itself is nothing uncommon for Game of Thrones, but it is peppered with some of the best dialogue a consistently well-written show has seen in a while. It can be tricky to underline meaning the way Weiss and Benioff did, as the old, dying man talks about the way things used to be, and even explains to Arya why it is that he’s bothering to hold onto a life he knows is literally slipping through his fingers.

It is a poignant scene that segues into an even better one between Clegane and his young captive, but it plays out so memorably because, for a moment, it is just a conversation between three people. No one has a specific agenda –a rarity for this show. The three of them are just talking their way around the idea of death – which Arya sums up by saying it is no better or worse than anything; it’s just nothing. And then things briefly turn chaotic once more, until the order of the moment is restored when Arya slays a man who threatened her in the past. The interchange between the Hound and Arya is incredibly well done, as it points out their understanding of the other – which is seen again when Arya tends to the Hound’s wounds after he regales her with the tale of why his face is burned – but it also emphasizes what the dying man was saying about there being no balance anymore.

And certainly, from the perspective of an old dying man of seemingly little importance, that notion may ring true. It may even be strengthened when the last two people he sees are a child honing her skills as a killer with the man planning to ransom her off. As unbalanced and chaotic as it may outwardly seem, the unlikely duo of Arya and the Hound have somehow made it work.

In fact, a great deal of what makes the episode work so well comes from the small ways individuals make meaning of the chaos or imbalance around them (deliberately or otherwise). Melisandre asks her “queen” to fetch something for her while she bathes and then confesses her witchy potions are mostly tricks intended to deceive men and force them into thinking what she wants. Meanwhile, Jon Snow’s words of warning continue to go unheard at Castle Black. This again ties Jon’s thread in (thematically, at least) with Daenerys’ rule of Meereen, but it also works with what Petyr says to Sansa: “If you want to build a better home, first you must demolish the old one.” Jon could simply let Mance’s army do what needs to be done, and raze Castle Black, and, if he survives, Jon can build a better one.

Allowing others to do what needs to be done, or cannot be done by one person calls to mind Tyrion’s predicament, and his inability to find a champion who will take on the Mountain for him. After Jaime and Bronn prove unsuitable or unwilling to handle the task, Tyrion’s unlikely champion winds up being Oberyn Martell. And, in Game of Thrones fashion, Oberyn’s motives are driven not by a desire to see an innocent man go free, but by a need for vengeance, a need to bring a little order to the chaos of his life.

Kevin Yeoman blogs at Screen Rant.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Sansa Stark and others deal with crisis in the newest 'Game of Thrones'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2014/0519/Sansa-Stark-and-others-deal-with-crisis-in-the-newest-Game-of-Thrones
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe