Switch to Desktop Site
 
 

Time magazine story: Yes, leading 'The Childfree Life' is rational, but ...

(Read article summary)
Image

Reuters/Daniel B. Wood

(Read caption) Time magazine's "The Childfree Life" has stirred emotions of parents and non-parents content with their choice to either have kids or not. A woman reads a book on a sunny spring day in the western Austrian city of Innsbruck, April 25.

About these ads

The cover of Aug. 12's Time magazine was (by clever design) instantly polarizing.

Entitled "The Childfree Life," it shows two young thirty-somethings splayed out on a white sand beach, relaxing with arms intertwined, not a care in the world evident on their tan, happy faces.

These people, we're led to believe, are "having it all [by] not having children."

 

As important as what the image depicts is what it doesn't: parents keeping a wary eye out to ensure that the kids don't drown, leap headlong into a bonfire, or try to pick up a dead seagull; kids pestering the parents for ice cream and throwing tantrums when their demands aren't met; parents so exhausted from travel with young kids that rather than smiling angelically at the summer sun, they sleep on the sand with their mouths open, snoring audibly.

The staggering statistic upon which the story hangs is as follows: "The birthrate in the U.S. is the lowest in recorded American history. From 2007 to 2011, the most recent year for which there's data, the fertility rate declined 9%."

Next

Page:   1   |   2   |   3

Share