Is TV in a reboot renaissance? Or are we just out of ideas?

Several TV networks have announced reruns or spinoffs of 90s hits. What prompted the nostalgic move? 

|
Robert Harbison/The Christian Science Monitor/File
An acetate overlay on a background from the TV cartoon series 'Hey, Arnold', created in 1999. Nickelodeon has announced they will be bringing back some old shows soon.

The TV shows we grew up with will always have a place in our hearts. At least that’s what TV executives are banking on.

Nostalgia is the name of the game for several TV networks including Disney Channel, Fox, NBC, and most recently Nickelodeon, who have all announced they will be bringing back old favorites.

“We are looking at our library to bring back ideas, shows that were loved, in a fresh new way,” Russell Hicks, president of content and development at Nickelodeon, told Variety. Though he declined to name any titles, possibilities include 90’s cartoons “Rugrats,” and “Hey Arnold!”

Following the announcement, fans on social media and Reddit began eagerly posting their own suggestions for Nickelodeon reboots including “Rocko’s Modern Life” and “The Angry Beavers.” However, several commenters were wary of tarnishing the original shows' legacies. Many commented that they were excited at the prospect of old shows returning, but only if the show’s original actors and writers returned as well.

Nickelodeon is likely making the move based on success seen from other networks. Last year, Disney Channel began airing "Girl Meets World," the sequel to the ABC's TGIF classic "Boy Meets World." Over five million viewers tuned in to watch the premiere, making it the top series launch of 2014 among major youth demographics, reported TV Guide. The show has become a fan-favorite show on the network with a 7.2 out of 10 rating on IMDb, compared to  6 out of 10 ratings for Disney channel original shows “Jessie” and “Austin & Ally” that have been running since 2011.

Fox also revealed a six-episode "X-Files" revival series that will launch in January 2016 and NBC was considering "Coach", the ABC sitcom starring Craig T. Nelson, before deciding not to bring it back. A sequel series to the hit "Full House" may soon be appearing on Netflix as well, although Netflix has yet to confirm the pickup.

So why the move towards nostalgia?

“There’s so much product, it’s hard [for something new] to stand out,” Vulture suggests. “Somebody sees a new series now and it’s, ‘So what?’ There’s ten a day.” With limited advertising budgets and an unlimited amount of competition, TV producers hope shows that already have a solid fan base, like old 1990s cartoons, will be an easy way to generate revenue.

“You announce something like Full House or Coach, and boom – instant interest,” a Vulture TV vet says. “People are buffeted with so much content flying at them ... anything you can do to get them to say, ‘I’ll check that out’ – that’s huge these days.”

Though nostalgia is a consideration for a network to bring back an old show, it certainly isn’t the deciding factor. Reruns and spin-offs must have a reason for being reborn, and must be well written for the show to actually generate any real success.

Jason Bailey, writer for FlavorWire laments: “Pop culture is now just a BuzzFeed “Hey, remember the ‘90s?” listicle.” But perhaps this will be just enough to bring sorely wanted viewership back to TV networks. From there, it will be up to producers to ensure that the revivals live up to the originals, or better yet, surpass them.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is TV in a reboot renaissance? Or are we just out of ideas?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/TV/2015/0903/Is-TV-in-a-reboot-renaissance-Or-are-we-just-out-of-ideas
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe