'Dancing With the Stars': What's going on with the score confusion?

The newest episode of 'Dancing' had two contestants sent home and more snafus over verdicts from the judges. What was behind the different scores?

|
Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
'Dancing With the Stars' contestant Nyle DiMarco arrives at the BAFTA Awards Season Tea Party at the Four Seasons Hotel in 2016.

The newest episode of “Dancing With the Stars” included two pairs of contestants being eliminated after the competitors took part in “icon night.” 

Von Miller, a player for the Denver Broncos football team, and Kim Fields, an actress who has appeared on such programs as “The Facts of Life,” were both eliminated from the competition following their performances on the May 2 episode. Ms. Fields had been competing with dancer Sasha Farber and Mr. Miller had been dancing with Witney Carson. 

Ginger Zee of “Good Morning America” and her partner Valentin Chmerkovskiy received a perfect score for their Viennese waltz, as did martial artist Paige VanZant and her partner Mark Ballas after performing a jive. 

Meanwhile, Antonio Brown of the Pittsburgh Steelers football team and Sharna Burgess received some of the night’s lowest scores, 24 out of 30. Miller and Ms. Carson, who earned the same score, were also on the low end. 

The night also included more confusion over scores. Contestant Nyle DiMarco, who became the first deaf winner of the reality competition “America’s Next Top Model,” and his partner Peta Murgatroyd performed a foxtrot and judge Bruno Tonioli first said that he gave the dance a 10 but apparently put a 9 for his written score. This was a concern earlier this season as well when there was a difference between what the judges submitted as a score and what they said during the show. 

Why would these be different?

On an April 18 episode, Mr. DiMarco and his partner Ms. Burgess thought they got a score of one 9 and three 10s from guest judge Maksim Chmerkovskiy and judges Mr. Tonioli, Carrie Ann Inaba, and Len Goodman. The judges hold up paddles to show their score and also give scores they’ve written to the producer of the program. 

But on the April episode, Mr. Chmerkovskiy and Tonioli gave scores of 9 to the producer but displayed 10 on their paddles. The scores the judges have given to the producer are the ones that matter. 

On the newest episode of “Dancing,” Tonioli did this again, giving a 9 score to the producer but holding up his paddle that says 10. But it’s the scores for the producer that will continue to matter as the competition moves forward.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Dancing With the Stars': What's going on with the score confusion?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/TV/2016/0503/Dancing-With-the-Stars-What-s-going-on-with-the-score-confusion
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe