As 2009, the big year of social media, wraps up, the Monitor’s language columnist considers just what a workhorse the word ‘social’ is.
They say that, during the Roaring ’20s, Joseph Kennedy knew it was time to get out of the stock market when he found out that his shoeshine boy was investing. A similar principle may be at work in the universe of social media now that I’m signed up on Facebook. For the true cognoscenti, this may be the beginning of the end.
But there can be no doubt that one of the big themes of 2009 has been social media. I can imagine some moviemaking team of the year 2089, say, using social media as a device to set a story in the early years of the 21st century the way George Clooney and his colleagues used cigarettes to anchor their 2005 film about Edward R. Murrow, “Good Night, and Good Luck,” in the 1950s. (Terrific flick, but I came out of the theater feeling I needed to detour past my dry cleaner’s on the way home.)
What a workhorse of the language our word social, with all its relatives and derivatives, is. It stretches across the political spectrum from left to right, and up and down the socioeconomic scale.
All the discussions about how people, usually young people at the beginning of their careers, need to be careful about what they post on Facebook because their employers, or prospective employers, might see it are ultimately a reflection of this breadth of meaning. Some employers, I hear, give their workers a “Facebook amnesty,” a window in which to take down photos deemed objectionable. Workers must comply or risk having their employer become their previous employer.