Switch to Desktop Site
 
 

Travelers, lawmakers up in arms over airport security measures

As the Thanksgiving holiday approaches, 1.6 million travelers are expected to fly. How will passengers deal with new airport security measures critics say invade personal privacy?

Image

A woman undergoes a pat-down during TSA security screening, Friday, Nov. 19, at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport in Seattle.

Ted S. Warren/AP

About these ads

As the high-travel Thanksgiving holiday approaches, travelers and lawmakers are up in arms over airport security measures.

On special web sites, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the U.S. Travel Association have been getting thousands of complaints. Facebook and Twitter are smoking with posted outrage.

In response to terrorist threats, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) now gives airline passengers two choices: Get a full-body scan using low-dose radiation that shows a naked image – everything from head to toe – which may or not be harmful to one’s health, depending on the expert cited. Or refuse the scan and have a stranger run his or her hands over every part of your body.

Related: Are TSA pat-downs and full-body scans unconstitutional?

Critics call it a no-win choice: Get zapped or get groped.

“With the holiday travel season fast approaching, we need to make sure that security measures are in place that actually make us more secure without compromising passenger privacy,” says the ACLU, which is urging people to sign its petition to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

Next

Page:   1   |   2   |   3


Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

Share

Loading...