As Facebook millionaires party, what future for new shareholders?

An expected 'pop' in share prices never came as Facebook went public this week. But Facebook's IPO was a measured affair, lacking in irrational exuberance, and laying the groundwork for the network's main challenge: Turning 'friends' into consumers.

|
Zef Nikolla/Nasdaq via Facebook/AP
Facebook founder, Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, center, applauds at the opening bell of the Nasdaq stock market, Friday, May 18, 2012, from Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif.

Speculators hoping for a big “buy, sell” cash out from the Facebook IPO were mostly disappointed Friday as Wall Street agreed that the $38 per share asking price set by the social network’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg, was just about right for the launch of the 8-year-old company’s publicly-owned entity.

The historic IPO – the second largest ever, behind VISA – made billionaires and millionaires out of hundreds of Facebookers as the company raised $16 billion by selling 421 million shares, setting the stage for the evolution of a firm that started as a digital college kid hangout to become a profitable purveyor of personal status updates and “likes” connecting about 15 percent of the world’s population

But as its value rose to rival corporate behemoths like McDonald’s and Amazon, the Facebook IPO also represented an uneasy ascendancy of a company that many people say teeters on being a fad, run by a 28-year-old wunderkind who prefers hoodies and sneakers over suits and ties.

RECOMMENDED: Facebook IPO: Five things to know before buying the stock

Although several underwriting banks had to buy shares in order to keep the price from dipping below its offering price, some analysts saw the measured debut as a good sign, setting the company up for a decent shot at building a profitable ad model to boost the company’s earnings and value.

“Zuckerberg priced the shares correct,” writes columnist Nathan Vardi, at Forbes. “This was not a modest debut; it was a home run.”

The stock price rose slightly on Friday as prospectors prodded before falling back to around $38.

The IPO created instant wealth for hundreds of private share holders, mostly around California’s Menlo Park. Zuckerberg himself is now worth $19 billion, about five times the company’s annual revenues, and U2 singer Bono, an early investor, saw his worth rise by $1.5 billion, making him the wealthiest musician in the world, richer than Paul McCartney.

But the IPO also came amid growing questions, including from General Motors, about whether Facebook’s ad model actually works. GM decided to pull a $10 million ad buy. And with revenue growth slowing, Facebook has also struggled in the mobile space, which will become, according to Zuckerberg, its prime goal this year.

The company has also struggled with privacy concerns, since it uses personal information to target ads. While some polls have suggested that Americans may be tiring of the “social utility,” it has, some experts note, become almost too ubiquitous to fail.

With public investors eyeing the company’s every move, the push to monetize content on the site is likely to be stepped up as Facebook now has to prove it can make money, all of which will continue to test the creativity of the young – and now very rich – Facebook brain trust.

“There is more pressure to make money and I think users see that,” says Roger Cheng, the executive editor of the tech site CNET, in a recent CNBC interview. “That said, people are stuck with Facebook, all their friends are on it. So … even if people are turned off by the ads, it is tough to see people leaving the Facebook service."

That fact alone won’t likely be enough to allay worries among Facebook’s new share owners and the bankers who bought shares to prop up the price.

As the IPO party continues on the West Coast – where Porsches are flying off dealers’ lots into the garages of newly-minted overnight millionaires – “anxiety increases on the East [Coast] – at least for the bankers fearful of Monday morning,” writes tech columnist Paul Sloan.

So far, most Wall Street analysts are holding back assessments until Monday's opening bell. Some, however, are already saying "sell."

“While we like the company, we’re troubled by investors’ perception of the risks,” said Brian Wieser, an analyst for Pivotal Research Group, in a meeting with reporters. “It’s priced for perfection and that’s clearly implausible.”

RECOMMENDED: Facebook IPO: Five things to know before buying the stock

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to As Facebook millionaires party, what future for new shareholders?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0519/As-Facebook-millionaires-party-what-future-for-new-shareholders
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe