Boston Marathon bombing: the blame game begins

Just days after the Boston Marathon bombing, the political maneuvering and blaming have begun. Some lawmakers fault the FBI for not following up on intelligence about one of the alleged bombers. Others want to prosecute the surviving suspect as an enemy combatant.

|
Julio Cortez/AP
Wearing his Boston Marathon runner's jacket, David Delmar, a member of Trinity Episcopal Church in Boston, attends a service at Temple Israel, which allowed the Trinity congregation to hold their service, Sunday in Boston. Trinity is within the blocked-off area near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, where earlier in the week two bombs exploded.

It may be plainly obvious who was responsible for the horrific Boston Marathon bombing on Patriots’ Day: ethnically Chechen brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, one dead in a shoot-out with police, the other seriously wounded and sedated in a Boston hospital where investigators are eager to interrogate him.

Unexploded bombs were found in their apartment, surveillance videos show them carrying heavy backpacks in the vicinity of and just before the explosions that killed three people and injured more than 180, and they are said to have acknowledged their responsibility to the driver of a car they hijacked.

But less than a week after a train of events that kept Boston-area towns on lock-down for days, the political maneuvering and blaming have already begun.

Russian officials warned the US about the older Tsarnaev brother – Tamerlan – in 2011. When Tamerlan returned from a six-month stay in Russia the next year, US officials questioned him and his family about any ties with radical Islam but determined that he was not a threat.

“The ball was dropped in one of two ways,” US Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) of South Carolina said on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday. “The FBI missed a lot of things, is one potential answer, or our laws do not allow the FBI to follow up in a sound solid way.”

“It’s people like this that you don’t want to let out of your sight, and this was a mistake,” Sen. Graham said. “Either our laws are insufficient or the FBI failed, but we’re at war with radical Islamists and we need to up our game.”

US Rep. Peter King (R) of New York is critical of the FBI as well.

"This is at least the fifth case I'm aware of where the FBI has failed to stop someone," Rep. King said on "Fox News Sunday," citing the examples of Anwar al-Awlaki, Nidal Malik Hasan, Carlos Bledsoe, and David Coleman Headley.

"This is the latest in a series of cases like this … where the FBI is given information about someone being a potential terrorist," he said. "They look at them, and then they don't take action, and then [those individuals] go out and commit murders."

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” US Rep. Mike Rogers (R) of Michigan says the fault in this case rests with Russian intelligence services who failed to fully cooperate with the FBI.

"Unfortunately, that intelligence service stopped cooperating," said Rep. Rogers, who chairs the House Intelligence Committee. "What happens is that case gets closed down."

How to prosecute Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is becoming another point of contention as well.

On Saturday, key Republican lawmakers – Rep. King and Sens. John McCain of ArizonaKelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, and Graham – urged the Obama administration to prosecute the younger Tsarnaev brother as an enemy combatant, which would deny him certain legal rights afforded those charged in civilian courts. Others have suggested that he be sent to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Speaking on “Fox News Sunday,” Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D) of California said that’s not a good idea, noting that the US Justice Department has successfully prosecuted 435 terrorist cases in civilian court.

“I do not believe under the military commission law that he is eligible for [designation as an enemy combatant],” Sen. Feinstein said. “It would be unconstitutional to do that.”

“I think there’s going to be a great deal of evidence put together to be able to convict him, and it should likely be a death penalty case under federal law,” Feinstein said. "I very much regret the fact that there are those that want to precipitate a debate over whether he's an enemy combatant or whether he is a terrorist, a murderer, et cetera."

Other senior Democrats – Sens. Charles Schumer (D) of New York, Carl Levin (D) of Michigan, and Dick Durbin (D) of Illinois – echoed that position Sunday.

No matter how the political maneuvering turns out – and it’s beginning to feel like earlier debates over how the Obama administration wants to prosecute terrorists – law enforcement officials investigating the attack have no doubt about who was directly responsible, and that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev intended to wreak more deadly havoc.

Boston Commissioner Ed Davis told CBS' "Face the Nation" Sunday that authorities found an arsenal of homemade explosives after a gun battle between police and the suspects in the Boston suburb of Watertown early Friday, the AP reports.

"We have reason to believe, based upon the evidence that was found at that scene – the explosions, the explosive ordnance that was unexploded and the firepower that they had – that they were going to attack other individuals," Mr. Davis said. "That's my belief at this point."

Federal prosecutors hope to charge Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as early as Sunday, a Department of Justice official told CNN.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Boston Marathon bombing: the blame game begins
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2013/0421/Boston-Marathon-bombing-the-blame-game-begins
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe