Why agricultural industry groups could soon be exempt from FOIA laws

Congress announced its support for Freedom of Information Act exemptions for agricultural promotions groups such as the National Pork Board and others. 

|
Eric Risberg/AP
Hampton Creek Foods CEO Josh Tetrick holds a species of yellow pea used to make Just Mayo, a plant-based mayonnaise, in San Francisco. The Agriculture Department says it is looking into documents obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request that show that an egg industry organization under government oversight tried to harm sales of an imitation mayonnaise.

After recent controversy, the US Congress has asked for Freedom of Information Act exemptions for organizations promoting agricultural products, including groups behind promotional campaigns such as “Pork, the other white meat.”

Although the US Department of Agriculture oversees advertising campaigns for different agricultural industries, which range from the meat and egg industry to Christmas tree organizations, the industries themselves pay for promotional campaigns.

After a controversy involving the American Egg Board last year, which arose when it was revealed through public records requests that the group had attempted to prevent eggless mayonaise sales at Whole Foods, several agricultural industries called for exemptions from the Freedom of Information Act.

After the Whole Foods scandal, the head of the American Egg Board stepped down, and the USDA launched an investigation. Yet, the American Egg Board, which is legally barred from lobbying, claims it had nothing to do with the FOIA exemption request.

"The American Egg Board had no role or involvement in the request by trade organizations for an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act," according to American Egg Board representative Kevin Burkam.

In April, 14 trade associations contacted the leadership of the House Appropriations agriculture subcommittee, asking for exemption. The letter was not signed, however, by the automatic promotional funding programs known as checkoff programs, as doing so would be lobbying.

The industries involved in calls for exemption based their requests on the claim that they are “not agencies of the federal government," despite the fact that the USDA oversees promotional campaigns.

Instead of being used to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests, these industries say, money that agricultural producers give to the promotional campaigns should be used for research and promotion.

The checkoff programs have traditionally been little regulated. Agricultural producers are required to give to the organizations in exchange for promotional campaigns that benefit their industry.

Industry boards have increased their revenue due to advertising efforts – the pork industry board saw $98 million in revenue last year.

"It's really pretty cut and dry,” Chase Adams, a spokesman for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, told the Associated Press.

Promotional organizations do have many critics, however, and have faced legal challenges in the past. In 2012, the USDA was challenged in court by the Humane Society, which claimed that the National Pork Board gave money to pork industry lobbyists, although board funds are not intended to pay lobbyists.

In 2012, the USDA inspector general also announced that the department could use greater oversight, citing misuse of funds as a particular concern.

The House Appropriations Committee approved the legislation in mid-April. While the Freedom of Information Act exemption is technically non-binding, the language of the legislation indicates that the legislature will press the USDA if it does not comply.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why agricultural industry groups could soon be exempt from FOIA laws
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2016/0503/Why-agricultural-industry-groups-could-soon-be-exempt-from-FOIA-laws
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe