Switch to Desktop Site
 
 

Gun debate 101: How would this assault-weapons ban be different?

President Obama's gun plan calls for a tougher version of a 1994 ban on assault weapons. Here's a primer on how it might work and what effects it might have.

Image

Five used military style rifles are all that is available in a rack that usually has over 20 new models for sale at Duke's Sport Shop in New Castle, Pa., on Jan. 15, as individuals buy up assault weapons in anticipation of a federal ban. The photo was made with a fisheye lens.

Keith Srakocic/AP

About these ads

Among other things, President Obama’s package of new gun-control proposals calls on Congress to reinstate the ban on assault weapons that was the law of the land from 1994 to 2004.

Such military-style rifles were the weapon of choice in the tragic shootings in both Aurora, Colo., and Newtown, Conn., the president pointed out. He said that their sole purpose is to “pump out as many bullets as possible, as quickly as possible,” and that they therefore have no place on the streets of America.

The proposed ban faces an uncertain future on Capitol Hill, however. Many lawmakers are leery about banning a particular class of firearm. Gun-rights proponents argue that “assault weapons” is a category based on appearance as much as capability.

How much do you know about the Second Amendment? A quiz. How much do you know about the Second Amendment? A quiz.
 

So what is an assault weapon, anyway? Are they inherently more dangerous than, say, bolt-action hunting rifles? If they are so bad, why did Congress let the previous ban expire? Do they have any legitimate purpose?

Here’s a primer to try to outline some basics about these controversial yet commonly owned guns:

What's the definition of "assault weapon"?

Next

Page 1 of 4

Share