Recreational drone crash: New vulnerability for White House?

There was no danger this time. But, like the spate of fence jumpers that troubled the White House last fall, the drone intrusion could indicate a security vulnerability. 

|
Susan Walsh/AP
Secret Service officers search the south grounds of the White House on Monday. A 'device,' possibly an unmanned aerial drone, was found on the White House grounds during the middle of the night while President Obama and the first lady were in India. His spokesman said Monday that that it posed no threat.

[Updated 5 p.m.] Secret Service agents found the wreckage of a small drone on the grounds of the White House in the early hours of Monday. The quadcopter, a widely-available four-propeller drone used by hobbyists and photographers, was being flown for “recreational use,” according to a statement by Secret Service spokesman Brian Leary.

The drone’s pilot called the Secret Service on Monday and turned himself in after seeing news reports describing the crashed aircraft. The agency will continue its probe of the incident with “corroborative interviews, forensic examinations, and reviews of all other investigative leads,” Mr. Leary said.

The Secret Service response to the incident was visible from outside the executive mansion fence. Emergency vehicles swarmed the White House prior to sunrise. After there was enough daylight, agents methodically searched the grounds, according to the Associated Press. They looked closely at the grass and used flashlights to illuminate the dense bushes up near the base of the White House itself.

The president and first lady Michelle Obama were in no danger from the drone as they were a world away in South Asia. It’s possible first daughters Sasha and Malia were at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, however. Spokesman Earnest would not say whether they were staying at home with their grandmother.

Like the spate of fence jumpers that troubled the White House this fall, the drone intrusion is an indication of security vulnerability. There was no danger this time but the fast development of small commercial drones poses a challenge to a troubled Secret Service. They’re small, they’re quick, and they’re hard to detect. Yet they’re capable enough to carry something lethal.

The White House almost certainly has some sort of point air defense. Small aircraft and helicopters have veered too close to the building in the past. In 1994, a stolen Cessna 150 airplane crashed on the White House grounds, killing its mentally troubled pilot.

Agents probably have a version of a hand-held, surface-to-air missile. It’s thought there is at least one longer-range defensive missile emplacement on a higher building outside the White House perimeter.

Small drones would require a different kind of defense, of course. Perhaps electronic jamming would work, or shotguns. If the Secret Service did not previously have a plan to defeat such a tiny intruder, it now has received a wakeup call indicating that it needs one.

Author Ron Kessler writes in Time Magazine that the drone threat is one the Secret Service has indeed made a start at addressing. Officials have contacted the US national laboratories in search of a solution. One idea: counter-measures that would zap drone innards with electromagnetic waves.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Recreational drone crash: New vulnerability for White House?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2015/0126/Recreational-drone-crash-New-vulnerability-for-White-House
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe