Human trafficking bills show how Congress can work together – aim small

The fact is, Congress frequently works in a bipartisan way, but it is generally on small-bore issues. This Congress could chip away at a number of issues, starting with Tuesday's House human trafficking bill. 

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Senate majority whip John Cornyn (R) of Texas speaks out against human sex trafficking during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington Tuesday. The House passed a bipartisan package of human trafficking bills Tuesday.

It’s a shock to the partisan senses to see as many as 18 Republican and Democratic House members stand before the cameras and unite behind legislation, as they did in the House TV studio on Tuesday. What brought them together are 12 bills to help prevent human trafficking in America and around the world, including child sex trafficking.

These are what might be called second-tier bills. They are important to particular constituencies, sometimes large, but they are not immigration or entitlement reform. And with the Republican-led Congress getting off to an acrimonious start with President Obama – and, in some cases, with its own members – it might be easy to miss notes of harmony.

The trafficking bills, which passed the House this week, are a reminder that Congress can play nice when it wants to – and on the smaller items usually out of the public eye, it often does.

“You see every week … bills that garner overwhelming support. They’re not necessarily the big bills, but that does not mean they’re not important,” said Democratic whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland, speaking with reporters on Tuesday.

Going forward, the question is what the Senate will do, and whether these sparks of bipartisanship can kindle any goodwill on the big stuff. 

Now that the GOP controls the Senate, backers of the anti-trafficking bills have high hopes that the Senate will move their legislation along to the president’s desk. Some of the trafficking bills – and other bipartisan smaller-bore bills on other subjects – passed the House in the last Congress, but they died in a Senate controlled by Harry Reid (D) of Nevada.

That wasn’t because of Democratic objection per se. It was because Senator Reid had a practice of keeping bills free of amendments. Reid was trying to filter out GOP amendments aimed at embarrassing Democrats. But that shutout discouraged other potentially bipartisan amendments, where these littler bills would have found a home.

His successor, majority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky is promising an open amendment process. That will give legislation such as the trafficking bills a much greater chance of survival, says Don Stewart, deputy chief of staff to Senator McConnell. The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee plans to bring the trafficking bills forward, according to House GOP leadership. 

Human sex trafficking is a problem on the rise, according to the FBI. It’s the fastest growing business of organized crime, and the third-largest criminal enterprise in the world. Each year, 300,000 American children are at risk of becoming victims.

The trafficking bills, working their way through the House this week, would do things like criminalize those who knowingly advertise for child and other trafficking victims, improve communication between the US and other countries on sex offenders’ travel, and help state workers and others recognize and support trafficking victims, whether they be runaways or children in foster care.

Some of the dozen bills were years in the making. They were brought together as a group by House GOP conference leader, Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington. She says other such bipartisan efforts are under discussion, including economic policies and tax provisions that “empower” women and families and that better support women at home and at work.

McConnell Deputy Chief of Staff Mr. Stewart sees potential for smaller bipartisan legislation in certain areas of trade and energy development.

“There’ll be a lot of things that we’ll agree on on a bipartisan basis,” says Democrat Hoyer. “What we really need is to forge a bipartisan agreement on the big issues.”

He doesn’t see that so far.

But some believe that small-bore bills can help pave the way to agreement on bigger issues. Former Senate majority leader Trent Lott (R) of Mississippi says they can “act as a lubricant.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Human trafficking bills show how Congress can work together – aim small
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2015/0127/Human-trafficking-bills-show-how-Congress-can-work-together-aim-small
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe