Romney says no to 2016. Who wins?

Mitt Romney told supporters Friday that he will not run for president in 2016. Jeb Bush is a big winner. But so, too, are Chris Christie, Scott Walker, and Marco Rubio.

|
Rogelio V. Solis/AP/File
Former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaks at Mississippi State University in Starkville, Miss.

Mitt Romney isn’t running for president in 2016 after all, and Republican strategists are heaving a sigh of relief.

With a large Republican field forming, it had become clear that Mr. Romney wouldn’t sail to the nomination, after winning it in 2012. Donors from the GOP’s establishment wing were in a bind. And a key operative, David Kochel of Iowa, just signed on with former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. Mr. Kochel was with Romney in both of his past presidential runs.  

Romney’s decision to step aside, three weeks after a surprise announcement that he might run again, helps to clarify the GOP contest and makes the choices clearer for donors and strategists on whom to back.  

“After putting considerable thought into making another run for president, I’ve decided it is best to give other leaders in the party the opportunity to become our next nominee,” Romney told supporters on a conference call Friday morning, according to multiple news outlets.

So who benefits most from Romney’s decision?

“Obviously, Bush is a no-brainer,” because of the big-money donors both he and Romney were competing for, says Ford O’Connell, chairman of CivicForumPAC.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, too, is competing in the GOP’s establishment wing, and benefits from seeing Romney go, for the same reason. But two other likely candidates – Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio – also stand to benefit, because they’re the two with the best shot at winning support both inside and outside the party establishment.

Romney’s decision benefits “Walker, Bush, Rubio, and Christie, with an emphasis, I would argue, on Rubio and Walker,” says Mr. O’Connell. “Walker and Rubio can run in both lanes.”

Between now and the end of March, all the prospective candidates are raising as much money as they can so they can post impressive totals for the first quarter of 2015. Fundraising, polls, staff hires, and positive media are the main ingredients of the “invisible primary” – the early period when likely contenders test their clout.

Romney was doing well in early polls of GOP voters on their party’s 2016 nomination, at or near the top of most (in the high teens or low 20s). But he wasn’t clearing the field. Analysts ascribed his poll numbers mostly to name recognition, as most voters aren’t paying close attention to the race. The first primaries and caucuses are a little more than a year away.

The departure of Romney also boosts the Republican Party’s chances of taking their next presidential nomination to a new generation. Though Bush is in his 60s, Christie is in his 50s and Walker and Rubio are in their 40s.

With Hillary Rodham Clinton seen as the likely Democratic nominee, some Republicans are hoping for a big age contrast. They want to show that they’re the party of the future, the party of new ideas. Like Mrs. Clinton, Bush brings his family legacy to the table. Christie, Walker, and Rubio would all signal a new day for the Republican Party.

Romney, too, would have been seen as a candidate of the past, having run twice before for president.

Still, Romney is not entirely ruling out the possibility that he may yet run for president in 2016.

“I’ve been asked, and will certainly be asked again if there are any circumstances whatsoever that might develop that could change my mind,” he said in his statement. “That seems unlikely. Accordingly, I’m not organizing a PAC or taking donations; I’m not hiring a campaign team.”

If anything, Republicans may be praying most for clarity in their presidential field. That probably won’t happen until next year. In the meantime, if Romney sees an opening to run after all in 2016, it may be hard to keep him at bay. He lost to President Obama in 2012 by only 4 percentage points – 47 percent to 51 percent.

Polls last year showed some buyer’s remorse among general election voters. A CNN/ORC poll taken last July had Romney beating Mr. Obama by 9 percentage points, if the election were held again. Polls like that may have encouraged Romney to explore running again. But for now, he’s back to the sidelines. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Romney says no to 2016. Who wins?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2015/0130/Romney-says-no-to-2016.-Who-wins
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe