Scott Brown 2016? Why testing the Iowa waters is a smart move

Former Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown (R) showed up in Iowa over the weekend – bait for political media. But 2016 aside, Brown and the GOP still win from the maneuver.

|
Will Wrobel/The Telegraph/AP/File
Former US Sen. Scott Brown (R) of Massachusetts watches a traditional drum ritual of the Pequot tribe during the 11th Annual 'Keeping the Dream Alive' dinner in Nashua, N.H., commemorating the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.'s death on April 4. Declaring that he's likely not done with politics, Mr. Brown refused to rule out a run for office in New Hampshire, while describing the Granite State as 'almost a second home.'

Scott Brown for president. Really? 

For folks who follow politics, that may well be the reaction. The former Republican senator from Massachusetts – who served not even three years after winning a stunning upset in a special election to replace the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) – turned up in Iowa over the weekend.  

And that has set political tongues to wagging, given the Iowa caucuses’ role as the first hurdle on the way to the presidency.

But, again, we ask: Scott Brown? Sure, he has good hair, a likable persona, and decent campaign skills. And he was a rare Republican who succeeded in the liberal Northeast (though ask Mitt Romney how that worked out in a national setting). But after losing to Democrat Elizabeth Warren last November, Mr. Brown didn’t even run for Massachusetts’ other Senate seat, the one vacated by John Kerry when he became secretary of State. Instead, Brown opted for a job at a major Boston law firm and a gig as a Fox News contributor.

So here’s why Brown’s visit to Iowa and other Midwestern locales – clearly aimed at planting his name in the 2016 chatter – makes sense: It helps the Republican Party, and it helps his own political future.

“Having all the viewpoints in there is good,” says Ford O’Connell, chairman of CivicForumPAC. “It does not mean everyone who’s in it is in it to win it. But I think he is, on the one hand, doing the party a service. The question is: How far does he push what appears, right now, to be nothing more than a publicity stunt.”

The Republican Party is splintering into three wings – establishment, libertarian, and neoconservative – and Brown’s moderate, “big tent” message potentially helps the party expand its appeal. Brown’s politics are fairly typical Northeastern Republicanism: hawk on defense and moderate on social issues, though not as liberal on gay rights and abortion as some in that camp. Brown’s message aligns most closely with Gov. Chris Christie (R) of New Jersey, a likely 2016-er with establishment ties.

Brown is also testing the waters for three other possible campaigns – governor of Massachusetts or US Senate seats from either Massachusetts or New Hampshire. Yes, New Hampshire: He owns a house there and has family roots there.

So, by floating his name for the 2016 presidential race, he is generating national media attention – good news for all those other seats he might be running for. (And we fully acknowledge that by writing this blog post, we’re playing along.)

There’s synergy, too, with his day jobs. Any buzz from national media coverage makes him more effective at the law firm as a rainmaker and a political celebrity on TV. In a Boston Globe interview, he expressed wonder at being recognized in such far-flung places as Mitchell, S.D., and Fergus Falls, Minn.

“They say, ‘I see you on Fox all the time,’ ” Brown told the Globe. “There’s certainly an appreciation here for the straightforward way I do my job and set out facts.”

Political analysts don’t rule out that Brown could end up mounting a legitimate presidential campaign. After all, the 2016 Republican field is wide open. But until Brown starts doing extensive polling, reaching out to national donors, and hiring new staff, then he’s still in a holding pattern, says Mr. O’Connell, the GOP strategist. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Scott Brown 2016? Why testing the Iowa waters is a smart move
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2013/0819/Scott-Brown-2016-Why-testing-the-Iowa-waters-is-a-smart-move
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe