President Obama's road to nowhere near the US Congress

If you ask anybody in Congress, in either party, how much interaction the president and his team has had with them or their legislative staff, and they will tell you none.

|
Evan Vucci/AP
President Obama pauses as he delivers remarks at the Department of Homeland Security on his FY2016 budget proposal, on Monday, in Washington. Obama warned congressional Republicans Monday that he won't accept a spending plan that boosts national security at the expense of domestic programs for the middle class.

For over a year, Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R) of Michigan has worked with Committee Democrats to craft legislation to make it easier for industry to bring to market life-saving medicines.

The 21st  Century Cures initiative is meant to break down bureaucratic barriers that prevent innovative drugs from getting into the hands of consumers and doctors. Upton has worked assiduously with the Rep. Diana DeGette (D) of Colorado to find a bipartisan approach.

Last week, President Obama unveiled his Precision Medicine Initiative, the main purpose of which is to do the same thing as Upton.

Given the political realities of the House and the Senate and the fact that they are now controlled by Republicans, President Obama could have made some mention of the Upton initiative or, at least, talked about bipartisan congressional efforts to achieve the same result or, at the very least, talked about how he and Congress should work together.

But in his statement, he did none of those things. He didn’t even mention Congress in his fact sheet.

It shouldn’t be that surprising but it is.  It follows a pattern, stretching back a year ago, when he said that he would use his pen and phone to achieve his legislative objectives, largely by going around the Congress.

After the election, he decided to implement legislation on immigration reform without the consent of Congress, making it difficult if not impossible for actual legislation to proceed .

He said he would veto the first bipartisan piece of legislation, the Keystone Pipeline, to come through the Senate under regular order in years.

He offered not one olive branch to the Republican Congress in his State of the Union Address, instead taunting them with the snide comment about how he won the last two elections.

He demanded that the FCC Chairmen implement net neutrality regulations, once again outside the legislative process, and once again an affront to Congress.

He did the same thing when he announced a new agreement on regulations meant to curb global warming and, once again, outside of the legislative process.

If you ask anybody in Congress, in either party, how much interaction the president and his team has had with them or their legislative staff, and they will tell you none.

The president doesn’t care a lick for the institution he once served in.

It goes beyond partisanship and enters into the territory of arrogance.

Either you respect how our Founders constructed our political system or you prefer to ignore a couple hundred years of tradition and show complete disrespect how our system is supposed to work.

The president has taken that second road less traveled and it leads to gridlock.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to President Obama's road to nowhere near the US Congress
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0203/President-Obama-s-road-to-nowhere-near-the-US-Congress
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe