Republican debate: why Rick Santorum faces more pressure than Mitt Romney

Wednesday night's Republican debate in Arizona may be the most crucial yet. But Mitt Romney isn't the only one facing pressure. Rick Santorum needs to show that his rise to the top is real.

|
Eric Gay/AP
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum speaks during a campaign rally at the Sabbar Shrine Center, Wednesday in Tucson, Ariz.

Mitt Romney faces enormous pressure Wednesday night in the only Republican debate before next Tuesday’s primaries in Michigan and Arizona – and the 10 on Super Tuesday a week later.

It’s Mr. Romney’s biggest chance to get his campaign back on track since Rick Santorum shot to the top of national polls after his stunning sweep of Missouri, Minnesota, and Colorado on Feb. 7. If Romney loses in Michigan (Feb. 28) and then Ohio (March 6) – two big heartland contests, including his native state – the political universe will be turned on its head.

But the stakes are just as high for Santorum – and arguably higher. Even with key losses, Romney will remain the best organized candidate in the race, with the biggest war chest and his name on the ballot in all remaining contests.  Santorum is still the underdog in all those spheres, and he needs to win Michigan to show that he can succeed in a big, hotly contested race.  

And to win Michigan, where the polls show Romney rising back into a dead heat, Santorum has to reassure voters.

“Santorum’s job tonight is to quell fears about his general-election electability,” says Republican strategist Ford O’Connell. “Taking on social issues to differentiate himself from [Newt] Gingrich and Romney is a good strategy, but it’s high risk. He’s been over-talking.”

Santorum’s first task, Mr. O’Connell says, is to take his strong views on social issues – a plus with the so-called “values voters” in the Republican base – and turn them into a discussion on limited government and strong families, not about telling individuals what to do. In recent days Santorum has been all over birth control, women’s role in society, and same-sex marriage.

Then there’s the story about his 2008 speech on how Satan was “attacking the great institutions of America,” now in its second day on the highly read Drudge Report. When asked about it Tuesday, Santorum didn’t disavow the remarks.

“I’m a person of faith. I believe in good and evil,” Santorum said in response to questions from CNN, host of the Wednesday night debate, which begins at 8 p.m. Eastern time.

Then he added that he didn’t think the topic was relevant to today.

“What we’re talking about in America today is trying to get America growing. That’s what my speeches are about. That’s we’re going to talk about in this campaign,” said Santorum.

As a former senator from Pennsylvania with working-class roots, Santorum’s hope is to appeal in particular to the substantial portion of the Republican base that fits his profile – conservative, religious, self-made.

Santorum has developed into a skilled debater, in contrast with Romney, who can blow hot and cold – and at times, allows his opponents to get under his skin. He, too, needs a strong performance Wednesday night, to remind primary voters why he’s been consistently at or near the top of the GOP field for months, albeit never rising above 40 percent among Republicans. The wealthy former businessman and former governor of Massachusetts often gets points for looking and sounding presidential, but has had trouble connecting with people.

The other two competitors in the debate – former Speaker Gingrich and Texas Rep. Ron Paul – will also have a chance to shine. Gingrich, the two-time national front-runner, needs a strong performance to attempt yet another comeback. Once Romney’s biggest challenger, Gingrich is now useful as he siphons support away from Santorum.

“Newt can rise above it and seem statesmanlike,” a Gingrich campaign source told Politico. “He does not need most of the air time.... This is the first debate where Newt is neither a front-runner nor one of nine on the stage. This can help. Romney can’t connect with average people, and Santorum scares the hell out of women. Newt might not look so bad, after all.”

Gingrich is known for attacking debate moderators – most memorably, Wednesday night’s moderator, John King – and has promised to talk solutions. The recent spike in gas prices is sure to come up, and Gingrich is ready. His campaign announced Wednesday that it will buy 30-minute blocks of time in “key cities” – as yet unannounced – in the run-up to Super Tuesday to air a 28-minute address by Gingrich on lowering gasoline prices, creating jobs, and achieving energy independence.

Congressman Paul, who brings a devoted cadre of libertarian-leaning voters to the mix, has played an interesting game of late, running interference for Romney by defending him and attacking Santorum. Paul and Romney reportedly like each other, and it’s possible that Paul is angling for a prime speaking slot at the GOP convention if Romney is the nominee. Paul may also be looking to influence the Republican Party’s platform. His role in Wednesday’s debate will also be something to watch.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Republican debate: why Rick Santorum faces more pressure than Mitt Romney
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/2012/0222/Republican-debate-why-Rick-Santorum-faces-more-pressure-than-Mitt-Romney
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe