Switch to Desktop Site
 
 

Who benefits from Chris Christie's decision to opt out?

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie decided not to run for president – a decision that appears to solidify the Republican field. But in whose favor? Candidates are now jockeying for position.

Image

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie turns to leave a news conference at the Statehouse in Trenton, N.J., Tuesday, after he announced that he will not run for president in 2012.

Mel Evans/AP

About these ads

Which candidate gets the Christie supporters – and money?

That’s the big question, in the wake of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s announcement Tuesday that he will not seek the Republican presidential nomination.

By many accounts, big money has been sitting on the sidelines, Governor Christie’s for the asking, if he had been willing to run for president. Names like Kenneth Langone, the founder of Home Depot, hedge fund founder Paul Singer, and industrialist and tea party funder David Koch were reportedly instrumental in the campaign to get Christie to run.

Now that their man has given them a firm "no," it’s time to decide where to direct the checks. The field is likely set, save for a possible run by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, but she’s no longer seen as a major player even if she does run. The big money folks want someone who’s electable. Then there are the garden-variety Republican voters still weak in their support of a candidate or even completely undecided.

On both accounts, it’s impossible to predict what the undecided will do. Those perhaps leaning toward Texas Gov. Rick Perry may wait to see how he does in the next two debates, Oct. 11 and 18. If he continues to stumble and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney continues to turn in solid but uninspiring debate performances, maybe a consensus forms around Mr. Romney as the most electable.

Next

Page:   1   |   2   |   3

Share