After three runs for the White House, US Rep. Ron Paul is retiring. Will his libertarian brand of Republican politics survive without him? A younger generation of elected officials and activists say it will.
Can the Ron Paul movement survive without Ron Paul?
Many in the GOP no doubt are just as glad that the 12-term Texas congressman – much more a libertarian than a traditional Republican – is retiring after years as perhaps the US House’s most prominent gadfly, a man whose principles and policies challenged the very basis of how the US government is thought of by both major parties operates here and abroad.
At what likely was the last major political event of his career, Mr. Paul bathed in the adoration of an estimated 10,000 admirers who greeted their hero at the University of South Florida in Tampa Sunday with cheers and thunderous applause. But it also had the feel of a swan song as he gave a sweeping survey of 20th-century history, laying out the points at which government became more powerful – in particular as it applies to foreign wars and economic and monetary policy.
They’d heard it all before as he ranged from war in Afghanistan to the Federal Reserve to government regulations on raw milk. But it was music to the ears of Ashley Nicole York and Antonio Rivera, both 26-year-old students, enthusiastic supporters of the “liberty movement,” as they prefer to call it, and the likely face of the future of the movement – if it is to have any future at all.
They’d each heard mention of Paul from a friend, then turned to the Internet – especially YouTube videos of Paul speeches – to become true believers and local Paul activists.
Page 1 of 4