In 1978 Egypt, Jimmy Carter had cachet. In 'new' Egypt, not so much.

Jimmy Carter brokered the Camp David Accords that normalized Egyptian-Israeli relations. This week Egypt's military rulers dissed the ex-president, refusing to allow his Carter Center to observe the presidential election next month.

|
Erik S. Lesser/AP/File
Former President Jimmy Carter speaks at The Carter Center in this September 2010 file photo, in Atlanta.

The news photo captures an iconic moment of the second half of the 20th century: President Jimmy Carter stands flanked by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, as the three leaders sign the 1978 Camp David Accords.

But that was then. This week Egypt’s interim military rulers dissed the former US president, deciding that his Carter Center would not be issued a permit to observe Egypt’s presidential election next month, the first since the fall of former authoritarian ruler Hosni Mubarak.

The Carter Center, recognized for its work monitoring elections around the world, was one of eight US-based nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to be refused a license by Egypt’s Social Affairs Ministry. The ministry said the permits were denied because the organizations “breach the country’s sovereignty.”

Egypt’s military rulers have moved to restrict the work of foreign pro-democracy groups as the country approached parliamentary and presidential elections this year. In December Egyptian police raided the offices of democracy and human rights organizations, and in February the authorities charged 43 workers from five foreign NGOs with illegal activities.

The arrests caused an uproar in the US and a rift between the two governments, not only because the detained individuals included five American citizens, but also because the US provides Egypt with more than $1 billion in aid each year – aid the US agreed to in the Camp David Accords that led to normalization of Egypt-Israel relations.

The Carter Center office in Egypt was allowed to observe parliamentary elections that concluded in January. The Atlanta-based human rights center has already dispatched election observers to Egypt in preparation for the May vote.

Center officials say they have yet to receive official notification of any decision on their license application, which they say was submitted in October.

The Egyptian government’s rejection of permits for the eight US organizations so close to the election – and in particular the barring of the high-profile Carter Center – is an added concern for Egypt’s pro-democracy forces, who are increasingly worried that the May 23-24 elections won’t be fair.

Egyptians returned to Cairo’s Tahrir Square last Friday for one of the largest rallies in months, to condemn what protesters claim are efforts by interim rulers to ensure election of a candidate who favors the military’s hold on power.

Some Egyptians say they are concerned that if international election observers are limited or nonexistent, the prospects for free and fair elections will dim.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In 1978 Egypt, Jimmy Carter had cachet. In 'new' Egypt, not so much.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2012/0424/In-1978-Egypt-Jimmy-Carter-had-cachet.-In-new-Egypt-not-so-much
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe