Trans-Pacific Partnership: Obama pushes US lead role in Asia

President Obama wants to anchor Asian countries that are increasingly tied to China’s economy to a free-market economy upholding Western standards and values.

|
J. David Ake/AP
President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, April 17, 2015.

President Obama’s quest for a vast trade agreement of 12 Pacific Basin countries involving 40 percent of the global economy may sound like it’s all imports and exports, jobs and commerce. To a certain extent, that’s what it is.

But more broadly, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Mr. Obama would like to conclude this year is about securing and enhancing America’s lead role in the community of Pacific nations. It’s about anchoring Asian countries that are increasingly tied to China’s economy – and overshadowed by China’s assertive behavior in its neighborhood – to a free-market economy upholding Western standards and values.

And it’s about advancing the “Asia pivot,” or “rebalancing” of US interests from the Middle East to Asia, that Obama has touted since taking office, but which most regional analysts say has not got very far as old and new Mideast crises have thwarted the shift.

This week’s congressional compromise on granting Obama special negotiating authority paves the way to swift consideration of new trade pacts – and that puts the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, and the Asia pivot, back on the agenda.

“If TPP passes, that keeps the US in the game in Asia,” says Walter Lohman, director of the Heritage Foundation’s Asian Studies Center in Washington. “It would make us much more of a factor in the day-to-day economic life of the region and for people, especially in Southeast Asia, who are really focused on commerce and trade.”  

On Thursday several key congressional leaders from both major parties announced they had reached a deal to allow a vote on granting Obama what is called “fast-track” trade promotion authority, or TPA. That authority, which has been granted to almost all postwar presidents, allows the administration to negotiate trade deals that will only face an up-or-down vote from Congress but no drawn-out process of amendments.

The Obama administration inherited the foundation of a TPP from the George W. Bush administration, but its size and scope has grown in recent years. At the same time, however, TPP negotiating partners, including Australia, Malaysia, Japan, and Peru, have balked at making key compromises with the US if Obama did not have TPA.

The prospect of quick TPA approval has senior administration officials – starting at the top -- talking about TPP and the “Asia pivot” once again.

On Friday, Obama used a White House press conference with Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to make the case for securing a trade pact with a region increasingly influenced by a booming China.

“The fastest growing markets, the most populous markets are going to be in Asia,” Obama said. “If we do not help to shape the rules so that our businesses and our workers can compete in those markets, then China will set up rules that advantage Chinese workers and Chinese businesses.”  

Moreover, Obama suggested that trade deals the US negotiates will adhere to labor and environmental standards and values that aren’t likely to be priorities for the Chinese.

“We’re negotiating the highest-level, highest-standard trade agreement in our history,” Obama said, adding that the TPA compromise, which he said requires that trade deals consider human rights issues, resulted in “the most progressive TPA we’ve had going through Congress.”

Obama’s use of the word “progressive” was almost certainly by design, since many Democrats were quick to blast both TPA and TPP as attacks on American workers and sure paths to more lost American jobs.

Other administration officials have recently underscored the importance of making economic relations, and specifically a regional trade pact, part of the US “rebalancing” to Asia.

In a speech last week before heading off on his first Asia tour as Pentagon chief, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said the TPP makes “strong strategic sense” and is an essential piece of the “rebalance” to Asia.

The Obama administration has announced a few defense measures as part of the Asia pivot – deploying 2,500 Marines to Australia, assigning four combat ships to operate out of Singapore by 2018 – and has upped US participation in regional political forums.

But securing a lead economic role in the region through TPP may be the key to convincing the region the “pivot” is real.

“TPP is a defining piece of the administration’s policy and in some ways it’s the most important part of the pivot,” says Heritage’s Mr. Lohman. “Our partners want to see a strong economic dimension to our commitment to the region.”

Lohman notes that Asia includes some of the world’s most open and dynamic economies, but also some of its most closed and repressive states.

That’s an argument for advancing a US-led regional trade pact, he adds -- one that would make a trading system based on international norms and US-backed standards a competitive model in Asia.

“TPP shouldn’t be seen in terms of competition with China on an economic level,” Lohman says.

 “Where the ‘competition’ argument makes sense is over trading systems and who’s going to be setting the rules,” he says. “TPP is important because it puts the US in the game to set the rules.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trans-Pacific Partnership: Obama pushes US lead role in Asia
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2015/0418/Trans-Pacific-Partnership-Obama-pushes-US-lead-role-in-Asia
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe