Menu
Share
Share this story
Close X
 
Switch to Desktop Site

Elena Kagan denies 'substantive' discussion of health-care case

Senate Republicans are worried that, as solicitor general, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan advised President Obama about litigation against health-care reform – a potential issue if the litigation makes it to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is sworn in by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D) of Vermont on the first day of her confirmation hearings on Capitol Hill June 28.

Win McNamee/AFP/Newscom

About these ads

Solicitor General Elena Kagan attended at least one meeting where legal challenges to the Obama health-care reform law were mentioned, but there was no substantive discussion of the litigation, the Supreme Court nominee told Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday.

Ms. Kagan, whose nomination is set for a committee vote on Tuesday, made the comment in a three-page written response to 13 additional questions the Republicans submitted last week.

The members, led by ranking Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, were seeking clarification on what role, if any, Kagan played in formulating the administration’s response to lawsuits filed challenging the constitutionality of President Obama’s health care reform law. The questions aimed at determining whether Kagan would have to step aside should the health-care litigation reach the high court, producing a potential landmark decision.

The senators suggested Kagan might have played a larger role than she stated during her testimony before the committee.

In her testimony, Kagan said she was never asked her opinion on the merits of the litigation.

She repeated that assertion in her response on Monday and expanded on it.

“I attended at least one meeting where the existence of the litigation was briefly mentioned, but none where any substantive discussion of the litigation occurred,” she said.

In a series of written questions sent last week, the Senate Republicans wanted to know whether she’d ever been asked for her opinion, ever offered her opinion, ever read or reviewed any filings in the case, ever approved any document, or ever offered her views about underlying legal or constitutional issues related to the health care legal challenge.

Next

Page:   1   |   2


Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

Loading...