What's the cost of reform? In Ferguson, it may be $1,335/hour

The city of Ferguson, Mo. has hired high-profile attorney Dan K. Webb to assist the city in bringing about reform within the police department.

|
Brian Kersey/AP/File
The city of Ferguson, Mo., is paying Dan K. Webb, left, $1,335 an hour to help the St. Louis suburb negotiate and possibly litigate reforms pressed by the Justice Department since Michael Brown's shooting death by a police officer there last summer.

After the US Justice Department released a scathing report on conduct by members of the Ferguson, Mo., police department, changes must be made if the city wishes to avoid a lawsuit.

Reform can be expensive. In the case of Ferguson, it may be about $1,335 an hour.

In order to negotiate and possibly enact the changes required by the Justice Department, the Ferguson City Council unanimously decided to hire attorney Dan K. Webb to head the charge. His hourly rate is nearly double Missouri’s highest attorney billing rate last year, reported the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and will not include any expenses and fees of Mr. Webb’s other employees who may contribute to the case.

While the reforms required by the Justice Department are extensive, some critics argue that hiring such a high profile lawyer is fiscally irresponsible for the city of Ferguson. So is it irresponsible, or is it simply necessary to undergo the transformative reform necessary to meet the government’s requirements?

The reforms come in response to a report released by the Justice Department exploring police conduct within the Ferguson police department following the shooting death of Michael Brown last year. The investigation revealed a history of targeting members of the African-American community, which lead the Justice Department’s demands that the city address issues of racial bias and profiling within the system.

The city decided to hire Webb behind closed doors, and only recently released details of his pay. Webb has a history of working on high profile cases, including the New York Stock Exchange, Philip Morris, and Microsoft. He was also involved in multiple government corruption cases, including that of John Poindexter during the Iran-Contra scandal.

Webb will work closely with the Justice Department to negotiate and enact the necessary changes to promote department-wide reform, as per the investigation. Some critics argue that hiring Webb was unnecessary to achieve reform. Sam Walker, a professor emeritus at the University of Nebraska-Omaha and an expert on negotiations within the Justice Department, said Ferguson made an unwise decision.

“He’s an outstanding trial attorney, but this is not a trial,” Mr. Walker told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “It looks like they don’t know what they are doing, and they’re gearing up for a fight.”

But Webb said that he thinks the city made a good decision in hiring him to work on the case.

“Yes, I try a lot of cases, but that’s not why I was hired,” he told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “The city wanted somebody who could try the case if necessary if they had to. But they don’t want to do that, and it’s clear to me that the Department of Justice doesn’t want to do that … I have resolved a lot of cases in my time.”

The city has already undergone significant changes since the report’s release. Multiple employees mentioned in the report stepped down, as did the city manager, municipal judge, and police chief. In early April, the city elected two African-American candidates to the city council, bringing African-American representation on the council to 50 percent for the first time in history.

Still, the city faces challenges in meeting the standards set by the Justice Department. Brian Fletcher, a newly-elected council member, said that already without legal fees and implementing reforms, the city faces a $2 to $3 million budget deficit for the fiscal year ending in June, and will likely face a similar deficit the following year.

This article contains reporting from The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What's the cost of reform? In Ferguson, it may be $1,335/hour
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0505/What-s-the-cost-of-reform-In-Ferguson-it-may-be-1-335-hour
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe