Baltimore awaits third Freddie Gray verdict on police officer – and the city

A Baltimore judge is set to announce a verdict for the third of six trials for police officers involved in the death of Freddie Gray. The city is anxious for proof that justice and change are possible.

|
Bryan Woolston/Reuters
Officer Caesar Goodson leaves the courthouse at the end of day four of his trial in Baltimore, Maryland, on June 14, 2016. Mr. Goodson is charged with the murder of Freddie Gray.

A criminal verdict expected Thursday in Baltimore, the third trial related to one young black man in police custody, will likely be seen as a measure of the city's judicial system, as well one man's guilt or innocence.  

Freddie Gray died of a spinal injury after officers bound his hands and feet before placing him in the back of a van. Prosecutors have placed the primary blame on Officer Caesar Goodson, the officer driving the van, who faces charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter, assault, reckless endangerment and misconduct in office.

Mr. Goodson's is the third of six cases relating to Mr. Gray's death in police custody. The first ended in a mistrial when a jury could not decide a verdict, a conclusion that frustrated some but highlighted the seriousness all parties gave the case, as Mary Wiltenburg reported for The Christian Science Monitor:

There’s some satisfaction just in seeing the judicial process at work, and the fact that jurors must have had strong convictions and stood by them, says J. Wyndal Gordon, a Baltimore defense attorney who’s attended parts of the [first] trial – and represents two young men facing serious charges that stem from the unrest.

“That takes courage in and of itself. [A]s a lawyer, I really appreciate that,” said Mr. Gordon, who stopped by the protest. But at the same time, as a black man who grew up in Baltimore, he says, “it’s sort of anticlimactic, because we didn’t get anything.”

In the second trial, Judge Barry Williams – the same judge who is set to decide Mr. Goodson's guilt on Thursday – cleared all charges. The case had many of Baltimore's black activists up in arms, although the protests were nonviolent this time, the Monitor's Henry Gass reported.

"So far we've had a mistrial and an acquittal. No one has been held accountable for the killing of Freddie Gray," Rev. Cortly "C.D." Witherspoon, a local activist, told The Monitor. "The only measure of justice that will lead to healing is the conviction of these officers."

But attorneys with knowledge of that case said the verdict represented neither a lack of accountability nor a failure of the justice system, as it left more "unresolved and unanswered" questions than any in recent memory.

"There are substantial benefits to a public trial and prosecution, whatever the outcome," Douglas Colbert, a professor at University of Maryland's Francis King Carey School of Law, told The Monitor. "Sometimes trials may not result in the justice that people seek, but lead to change that will avoid further catastrophes."

The value of a public trial has been displayed in this third case, as attorneys for the prosecution and the defense (the officer himself declined to testify) accused each other of dirty dealing in open court. The prosecution abandoned its initial strategy of suggesting that the van driver gave Gray a "rough ride" with the intent to harm after video showed him checking on the prisoner after a stop, and witnesses testified that Gray was kicking on the doors so powerfully that the van shook.

Regardless of Thursday's verdict, this case will have altered Baltimore, which experienced its worst-ever, days-long protests following Gray's death in April of 2015. Baltimore's fate, like that of Goodson, is still being decided, but one thing has become obvious already: new people want to weigh in on the decision.

Voter turnout in the April primary reached a record high, 20 percent higher than for the election for America's first black president, as the Monitor's Francine Kiefer reported. An incumbent mayor criticized for her response to protests bowed out, and voters instead elected Democrat Catherine Pugh, an African-American state senator whose district covered the poverty-stricken neighborhood of Sandtown-Winchester that Gray called home.

Crime has risen in those areas as police stepped back, but businesses and community groups are pouring in money in the hope that the conversation will lead to improvement.

"Baltimore is going to rise," Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings from Baltimore told the Monitor. "The question's not whether Baltimore will be fine economically, the question is whether all of Baltimore – and I emphasize all – will rise together."

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Baltimore awaits third Freddie Gray verdict on police officer – and the city
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2016/0623/Baltimore-awaits-third-Freddie-Gray-verdict-on-police-officer-and-the-city
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe