Appeals likely in Rutgers webcam case

Dharun Ravi was sentenced yesterday, but both sides are likely to appeal.

|
Lee Celano/REUTERS
Dharun Ravi stands alone in a New Brunswick, N.J., courtroom Monday following a sentencing hearing for his conviction in using a webcam to invade the privacy of his roommate, Tyler Clementi, and another man in their college dorm room.

The legal saga is far from over for a former Rutgers University student sentenced to 30 days jail for using a webcam to spy on his roommate kissing another man. The cultural fallout could continue, too.

Dharun Ravi, 20, was sentenced Monday, two months after a jury convicted him of 15 criminal counts, including invasion of privacy and bias intimidation and seven counts dealing with covering up a crime.

The jury found that in September 2010, he used his webcam to spy on roommate Tyler Clementi, who killed himself days later after viewing dozens of times Ravi's tweets about what he saw. One of them said, in part: "I saw him making out with a dude. Yay."

Judge Glenn Berman's sentence was far less than the 10-year maximum for bias intimidation — and apparently less than prosecutors were expecting.

Within hours after the sentence was imposed, the Middlesex County prosecutor's office announced it would appeal, arguing the sentence was too light for such serious crimes.

Ravi's lawyers are also likely to appeal the conviction itself on several of the counts. They say the jury got it wrong by convicting him at all. They have until July 5 to appeal.

In court Monday, a judge denied Ravi's motion to overturn the conviction and either dismiss the charges entirely or grant a new trial.

There have been clues in court filings and arguments to some issues might be appealed.

Ravi's lawyer, Steven Altman, raised a significant one in court Monday when he said Ravi did not get a fair trial, in part because of a ruling the judge made last year denying Ravi and his lawyers access to some documents found on Clementi's computer.

Berman, who reviewed them, said that they were not pertinent to the case.

Altman continues to take issue. He says that although the judge made clear that Ravi was not charged with Clementi's death, his suicide loomed over the case, making Clementi's state of mind important.

The documents may have shed light on that, he said. "Only your honor knows what was in it," Altman told the judge.

The story of Clementi and Ravi could resonate outside of court, too.

Clementi's parents have launched a foundation in their son's honor to address issues including online civility, bullying and suicide.

Ravi's supporters are calling for lawmakers to change to the state's statute on bias intimidation so someone in Ravi's position in the future would not be convicted of what is widely called a hate crime.

They have also sent a petition to Gov. Chris Christie requesting a pardon for Ravi.

With so much in flux, even the next step in in question. The judge told Ravi to report to jail on May 31. But the appeals could push back that reporting date.

RECOMMENDED: Tyler Clementi and cyberbullying: how courts ruled in five other cases

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Appeals likely in Rutgers webcam case
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0522/Appeals-likely-in-Rutgers-webcam-case
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe