Vijay Singh lawsuit against PGA for 'public humiliation and ridicule'

Vijay Singh lawsuit: The lawsuit was a surprise, and so was the timing — the day before The Players Championship, the flagship event on the tour held on its home course where Singh has honed his game for the last two decades.

|
Charles Rex Arbogast/AP/File
In Sept., Vijay Singh of Fiji, looks at the scoreboard on the eighth fairway during the second round of the BMW Championship PGA golf tournament at Crooked Stick Golf Club in Carmel, Ind. Singh sued the PGA Tour on Wednesday, May 8, a week after his doping case was dropped, claiming it damaged his reputation by not doing a thorough job of researching his use of deer antler spray.

Vijay Singh sued the U.S. PGA Tour on Wednesday for exposing him to "public humiliation and ridicule" during a 12-week investigation into his use of deer antler spray that ended last week when the tour dropped its case against him.

The lawsuit was a surprise, and so was the timing — the day before The Players Championship, the flagship event on the tour held on its home course where Singh has honed his game for the last two decades.

"I am proud of my achievement, my work ethic and the way I live my life," Singh said in a statement. "The PGA Tour not only treated me unfairly, but displayed a lack of professionalism that should concern every professional golfer and fan of the game."

Singh filed the lawsuit in New York, where he has a home and the tour has an office. He is in the field at The Players Championship.

The 50-year-old Fijian, inducted into the World Golf Hall of Fame in 2006, said in a Sports Illustrated article in January that he used deer antler spray and he was "looking forward to some change in my body." The spray was said to include an insulin-like growth factor that was on the tour's list of banned substances. The tour sent a sample from Singh to be tested, and it returned small amounts of IGF-1.

Tour commissioner Tim Finchem announced on April 30 that it was dropping its case because of new information from the World Anti-Doping Agency, which said deer antler spray was no longer considered prohibited because it contained just minimal amounts of the growth factor.

The lawsuit claims the tour relied on WADA's list of banned substances and methods without doing any of its own research, including whether such substances even provide any performance-enhancing benefits. Singh'slawyers said the tour "rushed to judgment and accused one of the world's hardest working and most dedicated golfers of violating the rules of the game."

"We have not seen the lawsuit, just the statement," tour spokesman Ty Votaw said. "We have no comment."

Some of the details and allegations that emerged from the lawsuit:

— Finchem had proposed suspending Singh for 90 days, and his earnings from Pebble Beach and Riviera would have been redistributed.

— The tour held Singh's earnings from five tournaments — $99,980 — in escrow without authority during the investigation and appeal.

— Singh's caddie, Tony Shepherd, recommended that he try the deer antler spray to help with his back and knee injuries.

— Scientists hired by Singh's attorneys discovered that IGF-1 is found in cow's milk. They also claim that the amount of IGF-1 in deer antler spray is so diluted that it would be comparable to pouring a shot glass of bourbon in an Olympic-size swimming pool, and then drinking a shot from the pool water.

"He's looking to reclaim his reputation and hold the tour accountable for acting irresponsible," said Jeffrey Rosenblum, one of Singh's lawyers. "He's concerned about his reputation. There should never be an asterisk next to Vijay's name."

Rosenblum also represented Doug Barron, the only player suspended under the tour's anti-doping policy. Barron sued the tour, and the case was settled.

The development dominated conversations at the TPC Sawgrass during the final day of practice for golf's richest tournament. Some players thought Singh surely would be suspended, and they felt he was let off the hook on a technicality. A week later, they learned he was suing the tour.

"Everybody is shaking their heads. It's unbelievable," Bob Estes said. "It seems like the tour did everything it could and everything right as the process unfolded to protect him and his reputation. Everybody is in shock that he would do that. It's not going to help his character. It's only going to hurt it. He got the favorable ruling. It's the week of The Players Championship. He lives here. He's suing his own tour."

Masters champion Adam Scott said he could understand Singh filing a lawsuit "if he feels like that."

"I would assume Vijay thinks he's doing what's right and the tour thinks it's doing what's right," Scott said. "Overall, these situations should be managed to be avoided. We don't need this in the game of golf. Honestly, I don't believe there's a real issue with performance-enhancing drugs in this game. When there's not really an issue, it's a shame that there is."

Peter Ginsberg, a sports law specialist and lead attorney in Singh's lawsuit, said the tour never bothered to analyze the trace amounts of IGF-1 in the bottle.

"What the PGA Tour accused Vijay of spraying was not a banned substance," Ginsberg said. "It was an inactive substance and could not possibly have any effect, good or bad, on Vijay. And that's something the PGA Tour easily could have determined."

Singh's reputation took a beating early in his career when he was accused of changing his scorecard in Indonesia in 1985 and banned by an Asian tour. He did not play any tour until resurfacing on the European Tour in 1989. He came to the U.S. PGA Tour in 1993, and since has made more than $67 million and reached No. 1 in the world.

Singh has won the Masters and the U.S. PGA Championship among his 34 tour victories. He holds the PGA Tour record with 22 wins since turning 40. His best year was in 2004, when he won nine times. Singh has not won since the Deutsche Bank Championship in September 2008, two months after the tour's anti-doping program was launched.

Singh has not spoken to reporters about any subject since releasing a statement in February confirming that he took the deer antler spray.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Vijay Singh lawsuit against PGA for 'public humiliation and ridicule'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0509/Vijay-Singh-lawsuit-against-PGA-for-public-humiliation-and-ridicule
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe