How can Navy stop sexual assaults? First, admit they happen, admiral says.

Two to three sexual assaults were reported daily in the Navy in 2010, and alcohol was a key factor in most cases, the admiral says, adding that the attacks erode trust and readiness in the force.

On the heels of a boozy pool party that led to the firing of a US Navy captain for skinny dipping with subordinates, top Navy officials say that they need to take a tougher look at the “command climate” that could contribute to sexual assaults, saying they erode trust and readiness throughout the force.

The key, says Adm. John Harvey, Jr., head of US Fleet Forces Command, is that commanders simply acknowledge that such events are not “a remote possibility but a likely possibility” and recognize those situations that can lead to their taking place.

Two to three sexual assaults were reported daily throughout the Navy in 2010, the most recent year for which figures are available. Of those, more than half – 55 percent – are “blue on blue,” or an assault perpetrated by a sailor against a fellow sailor.

“More staggering, these were only reported cases,” says Admiral Harvey, who estimates that “there could be 60 to 70 percent more” sexual assaults annually throughout the force.
 
The net impact of these assaults is devastating, eroding “the trust which holds us together as a Navy,” says Harvey, speaking Tuesday at a roundtable discussion with reporters at the Pentagon. “It destroys – I want to emphasize that word – destroys the readiness of the force.”
 
Such frank acknowledgement of the prevalence of sexual assault is beginning to lead to key policy changes that could eventually begin to bring down the incidents of the crime.
 
This week, the Government Accountability Office issued a report that found that the Department of Defense has now fully put into place half of the GAO’s recommendations regarding the reporting, documentation, investigation, and training in sexual assault prevention.
 
“Over time, the Pentagon has notoriously ignored the advice of experts, including its own task forces and studies – so it is encouraging that the DOD is taking steps to implement the GAO’s policy recommendations,” says Anu Bhagwati, a former Marine Corps captain and director of the Service Woman’s Action Network.
 
Yet some critics say the Pentagon must take further steps to address a culture that might lead to such assaults. Harvey acknowledges that it’s important to not “pretend that because we’ve set some training out there you’ve completely mitigated the possibility” that assaults could occur.
 
In most cases, “the key factor involved was alcohol,” he adds. “This is larger than just the Navy or a fleet issue,” he says. “It is cultural – it is what we believe about ourselves and how we act.”
 
Yet even in the midst of efforts to prevent sexual assaults, the admiral says, “we haven’t moved the needle” in terms of bringing down the number of rapes in the force or focusing in on some of the factors that might contribute to assaults.
 
The key is that commanders must acknowledge that assaults are “a likely possibility,” adding, “It’s the human thing when you put men and women together.”
 
For this reason, it is the commander’s responsibility to begin to “interrupt” the chain of events that can lead to assault. “Rarely are these spontaneous events that don’t have a trail.”
 
He cited as an example a group of sailors too young to drink alcohol legally who might come into a port of call and decide to get a hotel room and have someone buy liquor for them. “I know getting three to four people together requires planning,” and people might overhear this planning, Harvey says. In many cases, this group might include at least one female soldier. “Bad decisions start to get made,” Harvey says.
 
The key is for leaders within the Navy to keep their ears open and stop it. “When you’re the captain of a ship and you ... come into port, do you think of all that bad things that could necessarily happen?” Harvey says, or “someone in the crew who’s made a target of the young female sailor and is waiting for a target of opportunity?”
 
In most cases, “you tend to mentally say, ‘This wouldn’t happen in my ship, squadron, submarine.’ ” 
 
“But it’s happened two or three times a day across our Navy for the last couple of years.” 
 
So, he adds, commanders have to think, “Okay, no matter how great I think my sailors are, we’ve got an issue here that I’ve got to deal with.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How can Navy stop sexual assaults? First, admit they happen, admiral says.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2012/0411/How-can-Navy-stop-sexual-assaults-First-admit-they-happen-admiral-says
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe