Menu
Share
Share this story
Close X
 
Switch to Desktop Site

White House scores key victory on government eavesdropping

The Senate approved a bill on Wednesday that protects telecom firms from lawsuits over secret surveillance.

President Bush, center, is applauded by members of Congress and his cabinet, after signing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, (FISA), Thursday, July 10, 2008, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington. From left are, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, obscured, Vice President Dick Cheney, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., the president, and House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio.

Ron Edmonds

About these ads

Washington - "Lame duck" might not mean "powerless" after all. With only six months left in office, the Bush administration has won a rare legislative victory on a contentious issue: secret government eavesdropping.

The Senate on July 9 passed a final bill overhauling eavesdropping rules. The move marked the effective end of nearly a year of ferocious legislative argument over the extent of government electronic surveillance and the nature of surveillance oversight in the electronic age.

The result is a measure that gives the White House much of what it wants. In particular, it shields from civil lawsuits telecommunications firms that, without court permission, helped the government listen in on the communications of Americans in the months following Sept. 11.

The administration characterizes the measure as fair treatment of patriotic companies. Critics call it a coverup.

"Congress should let the courts do their job instead of helping the administration and the phone companies avoid accountability for a half decade of illegal domestic spying," said Kevin Bankston, senior staff attorney of the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco, earlier this month.

About 40 such lawsuits are currently pending in a federal district court. The White House had said it would veto any eavesdropping bill that did not contain the immunization provision, and Democratic leaders in Congress – worried about being portrayed as soft on national security – eventually included it.

Next

Page:   1   |   2


Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

Loading...