Sotomayor opens by stressing fidelity to the law
She presented a compelling story of family struggle and had a few words of explanation to her harshest critics.
“Throughout my 17 years on the bench, I have witnessed the human consequences of my decisions,” she told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “Those decisions have been made not to serve the interests of any one litigant, but always to serve the larger interest of impartial justice.”
The 10-minute statement came at the end the first day of her week-long confirmation hearings and set the stage for an anticipated full day on Tuesday of questions from senators.
Republicans are expected to grill the federal appeals-court judge about controversial statements she made in speeches and on panels suggesting that appeals-court judges are policymakers and that a “wise Latina” judge can render better decisions than white male judges.
At the heart of the Republican critique of Judge Sotomayor is a charge that she will favor the poor and powerless in litigation regardless of the legal merits of a particular case.
Democrats on the Judiciary Committee reject that view, insisting that her long record as a judge demonstrates she is a careful and restrained jurist.
For her part, Sotomayor told the committee that her judicial philosophy is fidelity to the law. “The task of a judge is not to make the law. It is to apply the law,” she said.
Although she did not use the word “empathy,” she stressed the importance of a judge being able to understand and acknowledge the concerns of the parties appearing before her.
“That is how I seek to strengthen both the rule of law and faith in the impartiality of our justice system,” she said. “My personal and professional experiences help me listen and understand, with the law always commanding the result in every case.”
In effect, Sotomayor told the committee that judicial empathy does not mean a judge places a thumb on the scales of justice. It means a jurist is able to achieve a deeper level of understanding of the parties and their circumstances.
With her mother, brother, and other family members looking on, she told the committee of growing up in modest circumstances in a Bronx housing project in New York. Her parents left Puerto Rico during World War II. Her father was a factory worker with a third-grade education. He died when she was 9.
“On her own, my mother raised my brother and me. She taught us that the key to success in America is a good education. And she set the example, studying alongside my brother and me at our kitchen table so that she could become a registered nurse,” she said.
Sotomayor studied hard and won scholarships, first to Princeton, then to Yale Law School. Her brother went to medical school. “Our achievements are due to the values that we learned as children, and they have continued to guide my life’s endeavors,” she said.
Sotomayor said her view of the judicial system has been shaped from several different perspectives. In addition to her service as a federal trial judge and appeals-court judge, she’s also been a corporate litigator and a state prosecutor in New York City.
“I saw children exploited and abused. I felt the suffering of victims’ families torn apart by a loved one’s needless death,” she told the senators. “And I learned the tough job law enforcement has protecting the public safety.”
The hearings are scheduled to continue Tuesday at 9:30 a.m.
Follow us on Twitter.