Oregon's 'death with dignity' law enters healthcare debate
Supporters say end-of-life care, including counseling and hospice, have made the state a model. Opponents look at Oregon and see "medical rationing" and "death panels."
It was inevitable that the debate over end-of-life issues and healthcare reform would turn to Oregon -- the only state that allows doctors to help people take their own lives.
It’s a profound and politically-charged issue. Depending on one’s point of view, it’s either “death with dignity,” to use the phrase describing the law Oregonians approved in two ballot measures in the 1990s. Or it conjures up images of involuntary euthanasia.
The Oregon law strictly prohibits "lethal injection, mercy killing, or active euthanasia." But it allows mentally competent adults who declare their intentions in writing, and have been diagnosed as terminally ill, to take a doctor-prescribed lethal drug themselves, orally, after a waiting period.
Since the law went into effect in 1998, about 40 people a year have taken their own life this way. Last year, 60 individuals did so (out of 88 who received the prescriptions).
Over the years, there have been no reported violations under the law -- no evidence that individuals have been pressured by doctors or family members. And Oregon has become noted for the quality of end-of-life care, especially the use of hospices.
But the law has always had its strong critics.