President Obama and members of Congress are scheduled to meet Feb. 25 to work toward a bipartisan agreement on healthcare. But Republicans say prior legislative work should be scrapped, and meanwhile this year's elections are fast approaching.
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
The frozen streets of the US capital this week could be a metaphor for Congress’s gridlocked and, for the moment, derailed healthcare reform. But President Obama’s call for a bipartisan healthcare meeting on Feb. 25 is keeping the issue in play – and in public thought.
At best, it gives Democrats and Republicans a venue to find common ground on the issue that both sides say is most likely to break the deadlock: reducing costs.
It’s also giving House and Senate Democratic leaders a window – and a deadline – to negotiate differences between the Senate and House reform bills, so that the president comes to the Feb. 25 televised bipartisan meeting with a coherent plan to discuss.
“Given everything that has happened, the time has come for more forceful presidential leadership,” says Ralph Neas, CEO of the National Coalition on Health Care (NCHC) in Washington, a bipartisan coalition that is urging negotiators to focus on new, “fail-safe” systems to lower healthcare costs by improving the quality and safety of care.
Pro-reform groups, such as the NCHC, are calling on House and Senate Democratic leaders to come to agreement, if possible, before the Feb. 25 meeting.
“If there is not agreement at the conclusion of this bipartisan summit, the president and his allies should be prepared to move promptly,” says Mr. Neas. “Once you get into March and April, election-year politics overwhelm everything else, and it will be increasingly difficult to enact a law.”
Pressed hard by labor lobbyists, House Democrats balked at passing the Senate healthcare reform bill, which imposing new taxes on generous “Cadillac” healthcare plans that especially hit union families. Unions want Senate negotiators to pursue other financing options.