What will Obama say about jobs? The pre-speech maneuvering begins.
In the run-up to his much-anticipated jobs speech Thursday, Obama challenged the GOP to put 'country before party.' The Republican response: 'Your economic proposals don't work.'
Obama has dropped only a few hints as to what the speech will say. In a Labor Day address in Detroit he indicated that it would include a push for more federal funding for road and bridge construction, and an extension of the current payroll tax reduction.
But his main message in Detroit was this: if it doesnâ€™t pass, it will be the Republicansâ€™ fault.
â€śWeâ€™re going to see if weâ€™ve got some straight shooters in congress. Weâ€™re going to see if congressional Republicans will put country before party,â€ť Obama told a largely Democratic crowd. â€śWeâ€™ll give them a plan, and then weâ€™ll say, do you want to create jobs? Then put our construction workers back to work rebuilding America.â€ť
This did not sit well with the Senateâ€™s top Republican, minority leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. In remarks prepared for delivery on the chamber floor Tuesday he bristled at the implication that it would be unpatriotic to not support Obamaâ€™s proposals.
â€śWith all due respect, Mr. President, thereâ€™s a much simpler reason for opposing your economic proposals that has nothing to do with politics: they donâ€™t work,â€ť said Senator McConnell.
McConnell noted that Washington does not feel the rest of the countryâ€™s economic pain. Its economy is booming, as the federal government gets bigger and bigger, he said.
McConnell then called into question the very idea behind Obamaâ€™s speech â€“ that the nationâ€™s government needs to do something big, and fast.
â€śAt this point, I think most people have safely concluded that the problem with our economy isnâ€™t that Washington is doing too little, but that Washington is doing too much already,â€ť he said.
House Republicans werenâ€™t as combative. Perhaps that reflects the reality that voters rate them even lower than they rate the president at the moment.
Neither Republicans nor the administration should consider their jobs packages an â€śall-or-nothing situationâ€ť, wrote Boehner and Cantor.
Is it possible that Obama and Boehner could strike some kind of bargain and produce another piece of legislation aimed at getting the economy moving again? (Donâ€™t use the â€śstimulusâ€ť word. Thatâ€™s got a bad reputation in Washington at the moment.)
Anything is possible in politics, so itâ€™s possible. Republicans might agree to spend some limited amount on highway infrastructure projects. Couple that with an endorsement by the president of an extension of the payroll tax cut, and perhaps some other tax reductions and one might get a bill that could pass.
But at a recent Brookings Institution seminar titled, What President Obama Should Propose in His Speech on Jobs and the Economy, economists held out little hope for a grand agreement.
â€śI think realistically the only policy the House of Representatives would approve is the tax cuts,â€ť said Brookings senior fellow Martin Baily.
Extending the payroll tax rebate would simply extend the status quo, not give the economy an extra boost, said Baily.
Another much-discussed tax proposal â€“ a tax holiday for corporations to repatriate cash they have earned overseas and have parked in foreign banks, is a â€śbad ideaâ€ť, said Brookings tax policy expert William Gale.
â€śWhen we did this earlier in the decade, there was no discernable effect on jobs,â€ť said Gale.
â€śBut if weâ€™re concerned with whatâ€™s going to have an effect over the next year or two, then I donâ€™t think passing the free trade arrangement with Korea and other countries is going to do that much,â€ť said Mr. Mussa.