Trump says New Hampshire win not necessary to secure nomination

After finishing second in the Iowa caucuses, the billionaire businessman appears to be tamping down expectations despite holding a double-digit lead in the polls.

|
Rick Wilking/Reuters
U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump talks with a guest at the Chez-Vauchon restaurant in Manchester, New Hampshire, February 7, 2016.

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said he does not have to win the New Hampshire primary vote on Tuesday to secure the nomination, apparently tamping down expectations despite holding a double-digit lead in that state's polls.

The billionaire businessman came second to Texas Senator Ted Cruz in the Iowa caucuses last week although polls put him ahead. His candidacy has alarmed the Republican establishment and has been marked by rows including over his calls for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the United States.

No Republican has won the presidential nomination without winning either the Iowa caucuses or the New Hampshire primary since the 1970s, but it would not technically be impossible.

Asked whether a loss in New Hampshire would derail his campaign, Trump told the NBC News show Meet the Press: "I don't think I need it. I hope that I get it."

"I would like to win but I don't know that it is necessary."

Recent opinion polls give him a lead of between 10 and 22 percentage points over the next closest contender.

Trump has built his campaign in part around his self-declared reputation as a "winner," and a loss in New Hampshire would intensify doubts that he can translate opinion poll support into votes.

He also told Meet the Press that he has spent as much as $50 million less than expected on the campaign so far, in part because the media provides him so much free publicity.

"People like you put me on. What do I take a commercial for?" Trump told the show's moderator Chuck Todd.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trump says New Hampshire win not necessary to secure nomination
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/0207/Trump-says-New-Hampshire-win-not-necessary-to-secure-nomination
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe