Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

US economic backsliding temporary? Maybe not if 'sequester' hits.

Next Previous

Page 2 of 3

About these ads

The tax side of that uncertainty has been largely addressed, but the spending cuts were merely postponed until the end of February.

Both Democrats and Republicans have said they’d like to address federal budget deficits through planned adjustments, rather than the automatic cuts – which would be divided equally between defense spending and a large swath of non-defense programs.

Budget experts tout the idea of a bipartisan accord, for example, that would focus on reforming entitlement programs, while dealing a less-severe hit to the economy in the form of sudden spending cuts. It’s far from clear, however, that the automatic spending cuts will be avoided.

To many Republicans, willingness to let the sequester go into effect represents an important bargaining chip, as they seek leverage in talks with President Obama and Democrats wary of spending cuts.

Some economists say the economy, weak as it remains, could withstand the spending cuts contained in the sequester without entering recession. But they generally agree that the cuts, designed to total about $100 billion a year, would represent a substantial blow.

Economists at Goldman Sachs, for instance, are forecasting GDP growth of 2 percent in 2013, matching the average of forecasters surveyed monthly by Blue Chip Economic Indicators in Kansas City.

Next Previous

Page:   1   |   2   |   3

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.