Should White House let Donald Trump pay for axed tours? (+video)(Read article summary)
The popular White House walk-throughs have been canceled because of the 'sequester,' and Donald Trump is among those offering to help keep them going.
Should the Obama administration allow Donald Trump to pay for the resumption of White House tours? Thatâ€™s an issue today because the popular walk-throughs have been canceled due to the "sequester," and the mogul/TV star has indeed offered to keep the doors open at the nationâ€™s executive mansion.
â€śIt sounds reasonable to me ... why not? Itâ€™s not a lot of money,â€ť Mr. Trump said Monday morning on his regular Monday appearance on â€śFox & Friends.â€ť
The Secret Service ordered the suspension of the tours to save on agent overtime, according to White House officials. Itâ€™s true that the money at issue isnâ€™t that much in the context of the federal budget or a billionaireâ€™s balance sheet: only about $72,000 a week, at most.
This has led to lots of Republicans charging that the White House is playing a variation of the old Washington Monument game by denying school kids their preplanned White House visits. Previously an administration, facing budget cuts, announces with great fanfare that the Washington Monument will be closed until further notice. The White House canâ€™t do that this time because the monument is already shut because of earthquake damage. So theyâ€™ve moved on to another popular D.C. symbol, the White House, for the same political effect, in the GOP view.
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R) of Texas offered an amendment on the floor the other day to ban President Obamaâ€™s golf games in the name of restarting the tours. Rush Limbaugh complained that the White House closed the tours, then spent lots of Secret Service money for a caravan that drove the president half a mile to an outreach dinner with GOP lawmakers.
â€śThey wanted people sad and let down, and they wanted people blaming the Republicans for it. And itâ€™s backfiring, not working,â€ť Mr. Limbaugh said on his show.
The â€śweâ€™ll pay for itâ€ť meme started late last week. First Fox host Eric Bolling said heâ€™d pay for a week of tours. Then fellow talking head Sean Hannity said heâ€™d do the same. Newt Gingrich on Twitter suggested Trump could keep the doors open for school kids indefinitely.
Some news reports suggested over the weekend that Trump had agreed â€“ if nemesis Bill Maher chipped in, too. But during Mondayâ€™s Fox appearance, Trump said heâ€™d heard about Newtâ€™s suggestion only when the Friends asked him.
â€śI donâ€™t think itâ€™s a big deal frankly, but it makes us look awfully bad and awfully pathetic,â€ť Trump said.
White House officials have said that in general, theyâ€™re not sure they could accept â€śWhite House Tours Sponsored by Trump National Golf Club."Â
â€śI donâ€™t know if itâ€™s technically possible,â€ť deputy White House press secretary Josh Earnest said late last week.
The sequester, Mr. Earnest pointed out, mandates across-the-board cuts that administrators have little flexibility in carrying out. With a political jab, he noted that many of the people calling for private tour funding also called the overall imposition of the sequester cuts a victory for Republicans.
Others note itâ€™s possible that the offer to pay for the tours could backfire.
For one thing, if tours, why not education funds for poor kids? Lots of things are being cut, fairly or not. Democrats might start asking if the GOPâ€™s offers reflect a socioeconomic bias.
And even if (though?) the White House has been overly dramatic about the impact of the sequester, real hardship will eventually occur at federal installations across the country. In the National Journal, national correspondent Jill Lawrence notes that local media across the country are beginning to report on the effects of the cuts on local airports, food banks, parks, and schools.
While the administration has been maladroit, â€śthe barely suppressed GOP glee at the White House fumbles, and the cavalier acceptance of the sequester by some Republicans, is also bound to backfire,â€ť Ms. Lawrence writes.