In retrospect, John Kasich’s rise was obvious

We had a feeling Ohio Gov. John Kasich would snag Tom Rath, a major New Hampshire Republican, onto his team. Now let's see if Governor Kasich keeps rising in N.H. polls. 

|
Jim Cole/AP
Republican presidential candidate Gov. John Kasich of Ohio speaks to a packed crowd during a campaign stop at the VFW in Derry, N.H., on Wednesday.

All things are clear with 20/20 hindsight, even or maybe especially in politics. Of course President Obama was going to win reelection. Of course Donald Trump would mesmerize us as the breakout showman candidate of summer 2015.

And of course John Kasich would catch on in New Hampshire – home to the all-important first primary – and snag one of the biggest Republican strategists in the state.  

When news broke Tuesday evening that Tom Rath had signed on as a senior national adviser to the Ohio governor’s presidential campaign, it made perfect sense. A month ago, this reporter was sitting in Mr. Rath’s spacious office in downtown Concord, N.H., listening to him ruminate about the 2016 race, and all the presidential candidates he had advised before, including Mitt Romney and George W. Bush.

He had just come off a 10-year relationship with Mr. Romney, a two-time candidate, and Rath wasn’t sure he was ready to love again. But he had that gleam in his eye. And he was being wooed with late-night calls, mainly from candidates’ staff. He mentioned phone calls from only one (at the time likely) candidate: Governor Kasich.

“I might have one more race in me,” Rath told the Monitor.  

Two days later, there was Rath again, at an exclusive event at the Elks Lodge in Portsmouth: the 90th birthday party for Ruth Griffin, the grand dame of New Hampshire Republican politics. Many other prominent N.H. Republicans were there, including Sen. Kelly Ayotte, former Sen. Judd Gregg, and former Sen. John Sununu, who had already signed on as director of Kasich’s super political action committee. The only presidential candidate (aspiring or announced) invited to the party was Kasich, and aside from Mrs. Griffin, he was the main attraction.

Kasich announced his presidential campaign nine days later. The week before, we reporters following him in New Hampshire – two from the main Ohio papers and me – peppered him with questions. Wasn’t it kind of late to get in? Nope, he replied confidently. What about fundraising? He had the numbers ready: In eight weeks of fundraising, his super PAC, New Day for America, had pulled in $12 million and with pledges, $14 million, he said. Not bad.

And what about that crucial first debate? At the time, on July 12, Kasich was polling nationally at around 1 percent – definitely not high enough to make the main stage, the one that would include Mr. Trump and guaranteed gargantuan TV ratings. But his July 21 announcement gained him some notice, and a little bump in the polls, landing him the last spot in the prime-time debate.

At the debate, Kasich gained more notice. He defended his decision to go against party orthodoxy and expand Medicaid in Ohio. He boasted of how his state went “from an $8 billion hole ... to a $2 billion surplus,” a claim that PolitiFact rates as “mostly true.” He spoke, as he often does on the trail, of wanting to help the mentally ill and the drug-addicted. 

Perhaps most memorably, he talked about the same-sex wedding of a friend he had just attended, and how if one of his teenage daughters happened to be gay, “of course I would love them and accept them.”

“Because you know what? That’s what we’re taught when we have strong faith,” Kasich said.

Kasich seems a natural fit for New Hampshire Republicans, who tend to be more moderate than in other parts of the country. Unlike Republicans nationally, a majority of N.H. Republicans support gay marriage.

The latest poll of likely New Hampshire primary voters has Kasich running third (at 12 percent), behind Trump (18 percent) and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (13 percent). That's up from 11th place (at 1 percent) in March.

It’s also worth noting that Kasich went up on TV early in New Hampshire with a $1.5 million ad buy, before he announced his candidacy. At Griffin’s birthday party, attendees gave the ad a thumbs-up.

Kasich still has his work cut out. He’s a little scruffy and can be prickly. But he won the Tom Rath primary, which means a lot. Not that most New Hampshirites know who Rath is, but in Kasich, they will see a candidate who is now benefiting from his wisdom.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In retrospect, John Kasich’s rise was obvious
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2015/0812/In-retrospect-John-Kasich-s-rise-was-obvious
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe