Why 'bridge builder' is IN for 2016 (but may be OUT for Chris Christie)

With the new Congress getting under way, the media is now casting about for potential new 'bridge-builders.' Presidential candidates often embrace the label. But it helps if you don't have a 'bridge-gate' in your past. 

|
Mel Evans/AP/File
The George Washington Bridge, seen in this Sept. 8, 2014 file photo, spans the Hudson River between Fort Lee, N.J., and New York. It became linked to the political fortunes of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie after a lane-closing scandal in 2013.

“Bridge builder.” A description pinned on politicians who seek to work with the opposing party. In this highly polarized political climate, it’s become the ultimate compliment among those pining for any semblance of bipartisanship.

In paying tribute to former Sen. Edward Brooke (R) of Massachusetts, who died this month, Boston Mayor Martin Walsh (D) said: “A fighter for equal opportunity and a bridge builder between opposing parties, Senator Brooke embraced optimism and change, constantly seeking ways to lift people up and bring people together.”

Similarly, when longtime Illinois Republican lawmaker Rosemary Mulligan died recently, outgoing Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn eulogized her as “an energetic bridge-builder who made Illinois a better place.”

With the new Congress getting under way, the media is now casting about for potential new bridge-builders. On the right, Washington Post conservative pundit Jennifer Rubin cited Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) of South Carolina as one possibility. “If he can be a bridge-builder in Congress and check the president’s worst instincts, America will be safer and the world more peaceful,” Rubin wrote.

Meanwhile, Post editorial page editor Fred Hiatt wondered if Sen. Tim Kaine (D) of Virginia is up to the task. He quoted Kaine as saying that the best political stance is “to be affirmatively proud of who you are and what you are, and then work together.”

It doesn’t always work to give yourself the description, though. In his Senate race last year against Republican Joni Ernst, Iowa Democrat Bruce Braley contended at a debate, “I’m a bridge-builder, not a bridge burner.” But he still lost overwhelmingly.

Presidential candidates invariably seek to claim the mantle. On the campaign trail in 2000, George W. Bush was the ultimate self-described bridge builder; he nabbed the GOP presidential nomination by claiming to be a “uniter, not a divider” – the political rhetorical equivalent of Rodney Dangerfield in the 1980s comedy "Back to School" declaring, “I’m not a fighter, I’m a lover.”

Of course, Barack Obama also campaigned in 2008 as a bridge builder. But once he arrived in the White House, congressional Republicans repeatedly complained about a lack of bipartisan outreach. Obama and fellow Democrats responded that too many Republicans had no interest in building any bridges – in reality, they wanted to blow them up.

As the 2016 campaign gets under way, the term is being revived. Krista Jenkins, a political scientist at Fairleigh Dickinson University in Teaneck, N.J., pointed to Garden State Gov. Chris Christie’s political problems as he contemplates a White House bid in 2016 – one of which already involves a bridge: “Given the governor’s obvious political ambitions, waning support outside his party faithful makes him a tougher sell to voters outside the state who are looking for a bridge builder.”

Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark write their "Speaking Politics" blog exclusively for Decoder Voices. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why 'bridge builder' is IN for 2016 (but may be OUT for Chris Christie)
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0116/Why-bridge-builder-is-IN-for-2016-but-may-be-OUT-for-Chris-Christie
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe