Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Behind the meteoric rise in campaign spending

(Read article summary)

Jacquelyn Martin/AP/File

(Read caption) Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has been seeking major donors for a possible 2012 presidential bid. The next election is likely to see an explosion of political cash, eclipsing the $5.3 billion spent in the 2008 and the $4 billion tab this year.

About these ads

The crucial subtext in the 2010 midterm elections is money – hundreds of millions of dollars spent in record-breaking amounts. Actually, that should be “billions” – probably topping $4 billion this year.

And it’s not just on the well-known races for the US House of Representatives and the US Senate, several of which featured humongous personal sums from the pockets of wealthy candidates. (More records broken.)

At the state level, campaign spending topped $2 billion – or to be precise $2,075,394,657 on statewide races across the country.

RELATED: Outside groups dominate 2010 campaign spending

The figure comes from the National Institute on Money in State Politics, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization in Helena, Montana.

It’s a terrific resource which collects reports submitted to agencies by all candidates for statewide office, including legislatures, state supreme courts, major political party committees, non-bond ballot measure committees, and lobbyists. Check out your own state or legislative district at

With the reporting barely complete for 2010 (and some very close races yet to be decided) it seems certain that the 2012 presidential election year will be another record buster, topping the $5.3 billion spent in 2008. Or as the headline on an Associated Press story puts it, “Too much money in politics? Ain't seen nothing yet.”

There’s another way to look at it, and that’s how much candidates spent to win each vote.


Page:   1   |   2   |   3

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.