Sen. Carl Levin (D), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, believes military sexual-assault cases should remain under the control of the chain of command. Many in his party disagree. What's his rationale?
Michael Bonfigli /The Christian Science Monitor
Why he opposes taking military sexual-assault cases out of the chain of command's control:
"[I]f you remove the chain of command, you are taking away ... the club that they need to change the culture, which is ... being able to prosecute someone."
The need to challenge the defense budget:
"We ought to look at the budget much more specifically than to start with an assumption that the current shares [for individual services] ... should continue."
National Security Agency technology that allows it to keep a record of all calls Americans make or receive:
"There are pluses to it in terms of catching bad guys, and there are some minuses to it in terms of abuses.... If this technology were in the hands of [former FBI Director] J. Edgar Hoover, would I feel comfortable? No."