Why Hawaii bill would treat homelessness as a medical condition

A bill introduced by a Hawaii state senator could free up Medicaid dollars to use on a proven approach for ending homelessness.

|
AP Photo/Audrey McAvoy, File
In this June 30, 2015, file photo, people camp out on a sidewalk in the Kakaako neighborhood of Honolulu. A Hawaii lawmaker wants to classify homelessness as a medical condition so that people could use Medicaid money for rent payments. As a doctor, Sen. Josh Green argues that he's constantly treating homeless people in the emergency room where he works.

On Monday, lawmakers in Hawaii plan to debate whether to classify homelessness as a health problem.

With nearly 54 out of every 10,000 residents homeless, Hawaii has the highest homeless rate of any state, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness. Democratic state Sen. Josh Green sees the Aloha State’s $2 billion Medicaid budget as a source of funds to address this problem.

Senator Green’s bill, which faces its first public hearing Monday, would classify homelessness as a medical condition allowing doctors to prescribe housing, and for Medicaid to pick up the tab.

"It is paradigm shift for sure, but the single best thing we can do today is to allow physicians and health care providers in general to write prescriptions for housing," he told the Associated Press. Dr. Green, who works as an emergency room physician, says homelessness often compounds other medical issues.

Describing social issues as public-health problems isn’t unheard of. For years, researchers have analyzed gun violence through an epidemiological lens, because shootings, like some diseases, tend to occur between individuals in close social contact.

But classifying homelessness as a health issue is slightly different. Rather than applying biological concepts to understanding the problem, Green’s bill establishes that, because homelessness compounds so many other health problems, it needs to be researched and addressed as part of the treatment process.

This approach has gained traction in recent decades. As far back as 2000, an editorial in the American Journal of Public Health argued, “Addressing upstream causes is essential in confronting public health issues.”

In the case of homelessness, it cautioned that a pitfall to this approach could involve focusing on the individual traits of homeless people – such as drug abuse and mental illness – rather than on the chronic lack of affordable housing at the root of the problem.

More recently, other states have reduced their homelessness rates by prioritizing permanent, not temporary, housing. The “Housing First” approach often involves giving people homes or apartments, no strings attached. Doing so, proponents claim, gives the homeless with the stability they need to address other problems and rebuild their lives.

Such a program in Utah cut the state’s chronically homeless population by 75 percent. In 2015, Mother Jones reported that “Utah's Housing First program cost between $10,000 and $12,000 per person, about half of the $20,000 it cost to treat and care for homeless people on the street.”

Expect to see statistics like these marshaled in support of Green’s bill, the first of its kind in the country. In 2015, Honolulu’s Queen’s Health System billed $89 million for treating homeless people, according to the Associated Press.

Some observers caution that it might not always be possible to draw a direct line between housing and health. "You need to really look at when that's appropriate, because there's a lot of people that become homeless," Connie Mitchell, executive director of Hawaii’s Institute for Human Services, told the AP’s Cathy Bussewitz. "Just because they become homeless doesn't mean it entitles [doctors] to write a prescription for a unit."

But across the country, a consensus is growing that housing can reduce the costs of keeping vulnerable groups healthy. "Housing is health care,” Ms. Mitchell explained, “because it does afford a person a much greater chance of sustaining their health.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Hawaii bill would treat homelessness as a medical condition
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2017/0128/Why-Hawaii-bill-would-treat-homelessness-as-a-medical-condition
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe