NSA not amassing Americans' photos for face-recognition program, chief says

The US spy agency is using facial recognition software, the NSA's Michael Rogers confirms. But images of foreign targets, not Americans, are the focus of NSA attention. Photos of Americans 'have very specific restrictions,' he says.

|
Larry Downing/Reuters
National Security Agency (NSA) Director and Navy Adm. Michael Rogers smiles at a Reuters CyberSecurity Summit in Washington, May 12. Rogers on June 3 addressed reports that the NSA is compiling images of American citizens for use in its facial recognition program, when he spoke at a Bloomberg cyber-security conference.

Adm. Michael Rogers, chief of the National Security Agency, acknowledged Tuesday that the NSA uses facial recognition technology to investigate foreign intelligence and counterterrorism targets, but he insisted that photos of Americans are generally off limits unless those individuals are linked to an investigation of a foreign subject.

“We have very specific restrictions when it comes to US persons," Rogers told attendees of a Bloomberg Government cyber-security conference, according to Bloomberg. “In broad terms, we have to stop what we’re doing if we come to the realization that somebody we’re monitoring or tracking has a US connection that we were unaware of.”

The blogosphere erupted after a New York Times report on June 1, based on documents leaked by former-NSA contractor Edward Snowden, said the spy agency is amassing a database of millions of images for use in its facial recognition program.

When the Times asked NSA spokeswoman Vanee Vines whether the agency is collecting images that Americans have shared on social media, she declined to comment.

Rogers's comments Tuesday imply that the NSA is not routinely sweeping up and curating images of Americans online or their driver's license photos. His willingness to discuss the issue with Bloomberg marks a step toward greater NSA transparency, something the admiral has advocated since he took the helm of the NSA and US Cyber Command in April.

During his Senate confirmation hearing in March, Rogers pledged to “be as transparent as possible about what we’re doing [at the NSA] and why,” Reuters reported.

The NSA track record for transparency would not be described as good. Secrecy is so ingrained in the NSA mission that the organization has been jokingly referred to as No Such Agency. The series of documents made public by Mr. Snowden and cooperating news outlets over the past year has helped to cement that reputation.

Snowden’s revelations have forced a national dialogue about how far the federal government should be able to reach into the private lives of citizens at home and abroad in the name of national security.

The House last month approved legislation to rein in the scope of NSA surveillance, which had been extended after 9/11 under the USA Patriot Act. The new measure, the USA Freedom Act, prohibits the bulk collection of data about domestic phone calls. The Senate has yet to vote on the bill.

Rogers told conference attendees that the "broad dialogue of what we’re doing and why is a good thing for us as a nation. I don’t question that for one minute,” The Guardian ‘s Spencer Akerman reports. Mr. Akerman's report notes that “he neglected to mention that the agency and its allies worked behind the scenes last month to weaken privacy and transparency provisions in a major surveillance reform bill.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to NSA not amassing Americans' photos for face-recognition program, chief says
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2014/0603/NSA-not-amassing-Americans-photos-for-face-recognition-program-chief-says
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe