As Scott Walker takes national stage, some home-state voters cry foul

Since Gov. Scott Walker's presidential candidacy announcement, Wisconsin publications have denounced his politics and the way he is balancing his two jobs.

|
Jim Cole/AP
Republican presidential candidate Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker reaches out to shake hands during a campaign stop at Seacoast Harley Davidson Thursday, in North Hampton, N.H.

If Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) has been divisive among his constituents in the past, his recent presidential candidacy announcement has drawn more critical eyes.

Governor Walker has come under fire for neglecting his gubernatorial duties in favor of the presidential campaign trail, as well as for his political moves, which have always caused controversy.

“We don't blame him for running, but he still has to do his job as governor,” said a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial published Tuesday. “There were signs during the recent debate over the state budget that Walker was AWOL at times.”

The Journal Sentinel criticized Walker for attempting to “win over” Republicans by “bragging” about his legislation to slash collective bargaining rights for public employee unions – an act that “cleaved the state in two” and inspired “angry protests.”

Walker’s approval rating in Wisconsin is down to 41 percent as of an April poll, though he is leading in all-important Iowa.

The Journal Sentinel editorial also criticized Walker’s delivery on promises regarding job creation saying he has lagged behind other Midwestern states and could not “come close” to the 250,000 jobs he vowed to create in his first term.

The Journal Times of Racine also noted in an editorial Monday the role Walker’s office played in the ill-received Republican attack on Wisconsin’s open records law, as well as its subsequent haste to pass the buck onto other Republicans:

A spokeswoman for Walker said on July 8 that legislative leaders notified the governor's office they were interested in making changes to the state's open records laws.

Then on Friday, Walker pointed the finger at Republican lawmakers directly while speaking on a WTMJ talk-radio program: ‘I think it was a mistake to even think about it in the budget, even though it didn't come from us.’ Walker's office earlier in the week acknowledged it helped draft the changes.

The Wisconsin GOP as a whole is also drawing attention for its accusations that the Government Accountability Board is biased against Republicans.

A Sunday Wisconsin State Journal editorial said there was “little evidence” to support the claims and criticized Republicans for citing the board’s secret investigation of Walker’s recall election campaign in 2012 as proof of anti-Republican sentiment.

The Journal noted that two out of four attorneys who approved the investigation were Republicans themselves, and the special prosecutor in charge has said he voted for Walker.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to As Scott Walker takes national stage, some home-state voters cry foul
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0717/As-Scott-Walker-takes-national-stage-some-home-state-voters-cry-foul
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe