In Arabic and Hebrew media, the 'other' is absent

A survey of Israeli and Palestinian media coverage of the ongoing conflict reveals a lack of acknowledgement of the other side's suffering.

|
AP
Israeli patrons sit in a cafe and read the morning's Hebrew papers.

Arabic and Hebrew media depictions of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas contrast starkly, with most publications calling for violent retribution and leaving certain narratives unheard.

In their coverage of the current conflict, Israeli and Palestinian media outlets have emphasized their own people's trauma, downplaying or even failing to acknowledge consequences and pain for the other side. 

"Anecdotes are non-existent of Palestinian suffering," says Seth Frantzman, an editor at the English-language Jerusalem Post, of Israeli media's coverage. “Even though we’re the most covered place on earth, people often drop the ball and don't see nuance or don’t adequately investigate issues related to the conflict."

Few Hebrew language articles have an on-the-ground view from Gaza, and headlines rarely mention the fact that the assault has led to Palestinian deaths.

The banner headline from Israeli newspaper Maariv read "The country is under fire." A front-page op-ed in the English-language edition of Israel Hayom (Israel Today), the right-leaning, highest circulation tabloid, is headlined "Return Gaza to the Stone Age." Written by Amos Regev, the paper’s editor-in-chief, the article called for a "a massive concentration of force." The top headline in the Hebrew edition read "Go all the way."

Most papers led with pictures of Israelis huddling in bomb shelters and lying beneath stalled cars on the highway. The few photos of Gaza that appeared include aerial shots of pummeling smoke with no specific debris of human scale.

Anchors on Israeli television networks have reiterated the call-to-arms and that Israel should not be forced to suffer rocket fire. Few if any Palestinian or left-leaning guests have appeared on news programs.

But Arabic media outlets weren't even-handed either. They highlighted Israel’s attack on Gaza without mentioning the hundreds of rockets that have been fired on Israel this week alone. There have been no Israeli casualties, due partially to imprecise firing of rockets and partly to Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system.  

"Israel continues to kill children and women," read the top headline of Al-Ayyam, a Palestinian paper based in Ramallah. Maan News Agency, a Palestinian media outlet, labeled both the Palestinian militant and civilian dead as "martyrs." Al-Quds, the Jerusalem-based, most-read Palestinian broadsheet, dubbed the weapons "resistance rockets" in its news coverage.

Since the beginning of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, 82 civilians have been killed and hundreds wounded, while the resistance rockets have aimed at Haifa and Hadera, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Dimona.

The official newspaper of the Palestinian Authority, Al-Hayat al-Jadida, published a more balanced take, acknowledging the Israelis huddling in bomb shelters. The article noted that rockets "prompted Israel to open all shelters from the south to Haifa in the north" and mentioned American and European condemnation of Hamas rocket fire.

Among Israeli media, left-leaning Haaretz has been an outlier, publishing an analysis questioning the end goal of the military operation.

It seems as if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is approaching the point of having to decide between two rather unpleasant options: Further intensifying the air strikes and risking another Goldstone Report, or sending a mass of ground forces into the Strip without being certain of what their objective is.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to In Arabic and Hebrew media, the 'other' is absent
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2014/0710/In-Arabic-and-Hebrew-media-the-other-is-absent
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe