Hugo Chavez: Global reactions to the Venezuelan leader's death

The death of Latin America’s “last caudillo,” or strongman, prompted an outpouring of eulogies from supporters, while those who kept cooler relations with the Venezuelan leader expressed hope for a democratic transition of power. Media coverage the world over highlighted the polarized perceptions many administrations and global citizens had of the Chávez administration.

Latin America

Juan Karita/AP
An image of Venezuela's late President Hugo Chávez sits on display at a chapel inside Congress in La Paz, Bolivia, Wednesday, March 6.

Leaders around the world who saw a friend and ally in Mr. Chávez mourned his passing and expressed “Bolivarian solidarity” with Venezuela. The outpouring was especially strong in Latin America, where Chávez had sought to create closer regional ties.

Argentina’s Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, who is seen by some as the ideological heiress to Chávez in Latin America, declared three days of mourning and was expected to leave Wednesday for Venezuela to attend the late president’s wake. A funeral is scheduled for Friday.

Venezuela’s closest ally, Cuba, also declared three days of mourning to honor a man seen by that government as embodying the spirit of the Cuban Revolution. The Granma, the official newspaper of the Cuban communist party, called Chávez "a son of Cuba."

He felt deeply our difficulties and problems and did all he could, with extraordinary generosity.... He accompanied Fidel [Castro] like a true son and his friendship with Raúl [Castro] was close.

His death marks the birth of the "true Chavismo," wrote Enrique Berruga Filloy, president of the Mexican Committee of International Affairs, in an editorial in the Mexico City daily El Universal.

From now on, his name, his legacy, his thinking will be used as a reference point and orientation over how Venezuela should be run. The next government may ask itself, 'What would comandante Chávez do?' "  Mr. Filloy wrote.

In Peru, Ollanta Humala offered “our Bolivarian, South American, Latin American solidarity” to the Venezuelan people. The president urged unity, calm, and reflection in Venezuela, and that “things can be carried out in a peaceful manner, within the democratic course.” Mr. Humala’s once-warm relationship with Chávez cooled as he shifted away from the populist style characteristic of his counterpart.

“Chavez will continue to be an inspiration for all peoples who fight for their liberation,” said Bolivian President Evo Morales in a tearful televised speech. 

News, comments, condolences, and hopes for the future lit up Twitter following word of Chávez's death, while in Spanish the hashtag #MuereChávez, or “Chavez Dies” rose near the top of the world's most tweeted on the social network. 

One tweet read in Spanish, "#MuereChávez but his struggle and his love for the people and the nation will remain forever tattooed in the hearts of his followers."

"Chavismo," said the editors of El Salvador's El Faro online newspaper, "will have to reinvent itself or die."

1 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.