Switch to Desktop Site

Pakistan attacks reveal widening split between religious parties and militants

Successive, yet unsuccessful assassination attempts on Maulana Fazl ur Rehman of the group Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl show Islamic militants' growing disdain for even sympathetic political leaders.


A policeman gestures in front of a shop damaged by a bomb explosion in Charsadda, in Pakistan's northwest March 31. A prominent Pakistani Islamist politician narrowly escaped an apparent assassination attempt on Thursday when the bomb exploded near his car in the the country's volatile northwest, killing at least 11 people, government officials and aides said.

Fayaz Aziz/Reuters

About these ads

Two assassination attempts in so many days on the life of a key Islamist leader here appear to represent a strong message from militants: even sympathetic politicians aren't safe.

Maulana Fazl ur Rehman of the powerful, hard-line group Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) survived Thursday's suicide bombing at a rally in the northwestern town of Charsadda, but the attack left 12 dead and 29 injured. He also walked away from an attack on his convoy Wednesday.

Pakistan’s religious parties have been vocal in their opposition to the United States and to progressive domestic policies, such as reforming the blasphemy law, which critics say are used to target religious minorities. But that’s not always enough to shield them from attacks from more hardcore groups like the Pakistan Taliban, says retired Gen. Talat Masood, a security analyst.

Many have accused the Pakistan Taliban for the attacks, but no group has yet claimed responsibility.

While the back-to-back bombings demonstrate a gulf between Pakistan’s mainstream religious parties and more hard-line militants, who are inherently opposed to the political process, they may have also resulted from specific doubts about the sincerity of Rehman's promises to extremists that he's on their side, say experts.


Page:   1   |   2   |   3